Creating a content validation process to advance a campus-wide leadership framework

Purpose A content validation process of an institutional leadership framework is described for leadership educators in higher education. We created this process to further integrate our leadership framework across campus, maintain alignment with advancements in leadership research and ensure it is broadly inclusive and culturally responsive. Design/methodology/approach Our approach included seven essential design elements and was informed by a review of leadership frameworks in practice and the literature, validation studies and a comprehensive document review. Findings Our approach yielded a validated leadership framework with modifications to its principles, values, competencies and outcomes. Modifications addressed pre-determined criteria and were deemed relevant to leadership research and our institutional context. Originality/value The external content validation process of our leadership framework is novel and serves as a valuable guide for those considering opportunities to strengthen their own institutional approaches to leadership education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Leadership Education
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jole-04-2024-0055
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creating a content validation process to advance a campus-wide leadership framework

Mark R. Kueppers, Alfred Kaufman
Journal of Leadership Education
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Creating a content validation process to advance a campus-wide leadership framework

Mark R. Kueppers, Alfred Kaufman
article en

Abstract

Purpose A content validation process of an institutional leadership framework is described for leadership educators in higher education. We created this process to further integrate our leadership framework across campus, maintain alignment with advancements in leadership research and ensure it is broadly inclusive and culturally responsive. Design/methodology/approach Our approach included seven essential design elements and was informed by a review of leadership frameworks in practice and the literature, validation studies and a comprehensive document review. Findings Our approach yielded a validated leadership framework with modifications to its principles, values, competencies and outcomes. Modifications addressed pre-determined criteria and were deemed relevant to leadership research and our institutional context. Originality/value The external content validation process of our leadership framework is novel and serves as a valuable guide for those considering opportunities to strengthen their own institutional approaches to leadership education.

Journal of Leadership EducationVol. 25(1)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Wisconsin Division of Public Health (US), Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Creating a content validation process to advance a campus-wide leadership framework — Mark R. Kueppers, Alfred Kaufman · Journal of Leadership Education (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS