Under Armour: Revenue Pull Forwards and Disclosure Failures

This case examines a recent SEC settlement with Under Armour, a public company traded on the NYSE, that was charged with misleading investors and failing to disclosure uncertainties relating to its reported revenues. Under Amour was not able to meet analysts’ sales projections for several consecutive quarters in 2015 and 2016 and resorted to “pulling forward” revenue from future periods in order to meet these estimates. More than $408 million was pulled forward, and during this time Under Armour continued to credit its growth to apparel, footwear and other new offerings. The case was settled in May 2021 and Under Armour paid a $9 million penalty. The case spotlights several important accounting and ethics issues in the context of a real, multi-national company that most college students are familiar with. From an accounting perspective, the revenue pull forwards, manipulation of payment terms and omission of material facts in financial reporting are discussed. From an ethics perspective, a discussion is included on the timing of reporting “earned” revenue, the legality of inducing customers to accept early shipments and the difference between omitting information and misleading investors.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Business & Management Studies
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56734/ijbms.v5n11a1
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Under Armour: Revenue Pull Forwards and Disclosure Failures

Devon Baranek
International Journal of Business & Management Studies
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
article

Under Armour: Revenue Pull Forwards and Disclosure Failures

Devon Baranek
article en

Abstract

This case examines a recent SEC settlement with Under Armour, a public company traded on the NYSE, that was charged with misleading investors and failing to disclosure uncertainties relating to its reported revenues. Under Amour was not able to meet analysts’ sales projections for several consecutive quarters in 2015 and 2016 and resorted to “pulling forward” revenue from future periods in order to meet these estimates. More than $408 million was pulled forward, and during this time Under Armour continued to credit its growth to apparel, footwear and other new offerings. The case was settled in May 2021 and Under Armour paid a $9 million penalty. The case spotlights several important accounting and ethics issues in the context of a real, multi-national company that most college students are familiar with. From an accounting perspective, the revenue pull forwards, manipulation of payment terms and omission of material facts in financial reporting are discussed. From an ethics perspective, a discussion is included on the timing of reporting “earned” revenue, the legality of inducing customers to accept early shipments and the difference between omitting information and misleading investors.

International Journal of Business & Management StudiesVol. 05(11)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Under Armour: Revenue Pull Forwards and Disclosure Failures — Devon Baranek · International Journal of Business & Management Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS