Factors Influencing Informed Consent Preferences in Digital Health Research: Survey Study of Prospective Participants

The findings point toward new ways of evaluating informed consent communication: (1) for responsiveness to specific prospective participant populations, and (2) effectiveness at eliciting informed questions from people considering participation. We discuss how creating partnerships with prospective participants to prototype informed consent materials, specifically study procedures and risks, can be a way to identify those details before launching a study. Furthermore, future research should go beyond "readability" to explore alternate measures of evaluating consent materials, such as the likelihood that the consent material and communication procedures will elicit "informed questions" for the research team.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/63349
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Influencing Informed Consent Preferences in Digital Health Research: Survey Study of Prospective Participants

Daniela G. Vital, Camille Nebeker, Daniah Kareem, Eric B. Hekler et al.
4 citations
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Ethics in Clinical Research
2.17
article

Factors Influencing Informed Consent Preferences in Digital Health Research: Survey Study of Prospective Participants

Daniela G. Vital, Camille Nebeker, Daniah Kareem, Eric B. Hekler, Brian McInnis, Ramona Pindus
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The findings point toward new ways of evaluating informed consent communication: (1) for responsiveness to specific prospective participant populations, and (2) effectiveness at eliciting informed questions from people considering participation. We discuss how creating partnerships with prospective participants to prototype informed consent materials, specifically study procedures and risks, can be a way to identify those details before launching a study. Furthermore, future research should go beyond "readability" to explore alternate measures of evaluating consent materials, such as the likelihood that the consent material and communication procedures will elicit "informed questions" for the research team.

Journal of Medical Internet ResearchVol. 27
University of California San Diego (US), Human Longevity (United States) (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ethics in Clinical Research
2.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Factors Influencing Informed Consent Preferences in Digital Health Research: Survey Study of Prospective Participants — Daniela G. Vital, Camille Nebeker, et al. · Journal of Medical Internet Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS