Collaborative CAD in Support of Engineering Design Reviews

Abstract The focus of this paper is on evaluating the needs of distributed design reviews and establishing requirements on tools to support designer reviews. Specifically, this research explores the US Department of Defense acquisition process. This literature review and requirement generation explores the impact of Multi-User CAD (MUCAD) systems on collaborative design reviews and how quasi-asynchronous design reviews using MUCAD systems can enhance the understanding of product design. This paper describes synchronous and asynchronous design reviews to make a case for a combined approach that utilizes MUCAD systems. In this research, the generated requirements for a successful collaborative MUCAD system are divided into seven categories: concurrency, heterogeneity, annotations, IP protection, security, version control, and viewing. This paper serves as a guideline for future tests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2024-142597
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collaborative CAD in Support of Engineering Design Reviews

Gregory Mocko, Eric Patterson, Emily Petty, Nathan Edmonds
BIM and Construction Integration
article

Collaborative CAD in Support of Engineering Design Reviews

Gregory Mocko, Eric Patterson, Emily Petty, Nathan Edmonds
article en

Abstract

Abstract The focus of this paper is on evaluating the needs of distributed design reviews and establishing requirements on tools to support designer reviews. Specifically, this research explores the US Department of Defense acquisition process. This literature review and requirement generation explores the impact of Multi-User CAD (MUCAD) systems on collaborative design reviews and how quasi-asynchronous design reviews using MUCAD systems can enhance the understanding of product design. This paper describes synchronous and asynchronous design reviews to make a case for a combined approach that utilizes MUCAD systems. In this research, the generated requirements for a successful collaborative MUCAD system are divided into seven categories: concurrency, heterogeneity, annotations, IP protection, security, version control, and viewing. This paper serves as a guideline for future tests.

Clemson University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
BIM and Construction Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Collaborative CAD in Support of Engineering Design Reviews — Gregory Mocko, Eric Patterson, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS