Bridging the divide in organismal physiology: a case for the integration of behaviour as a physiological process

The role of behaviour in animal physiology is much debated, with researchers divided between the traditional view that separates physiology and behaviour, and a progressive perspective that sees behaviour as a physiological effector. We advocate for the latter, and in this Commentary, we argue that behaviour is inherently a physiological process. To do so, we outline the physiological basis for behaviour and draw parallels with recognised physiological processes. We also emphasise the importance of precise language that is shared across biological disciplines, as clear communication is foundational in integrating behaviour into physiology. Our goal with this Commentary is to set the stage for a debate and persuade readers of the merits of including behaviour within the domain of animal physiology. We argue that recognising behaviour as a physiological process is crucial for advancing a unified understanding of physiology, especially in the context of anthropogenic impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.247685
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Physiological and biochemical adaptations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the divide in organismal physiology: a case for the integration of behaviour as a physiological process

Shamil F. Debaere, April Grace R. Opinion, Gudrun De Boeck, Bridie J. M. Allan et al.
5 citations
Journal of Experimental Biology
Physiological and biochemical adaptations
2.29
article

Bridging the divide in organismal physiology: a case for the integration of behaviour as a physiological process

Shamil F. Debaere, April Grace R. Opinion, Gudrun De Boeck, Bridie J. M. Allan, Jodie L. Rummer
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The role of behaviour in animal physiology is much debated, with researchers divided between the traditional view that separates physiology and behaviour, and a progressive perspective that sees behaviour as a physiological effector. We advocate for the latter, and in this Commentary, we argue that behaviour is inherently a physiological process. To do so, we outline the physiological basis for behaviour and draw parallels with recognised physiological processes. We also emphasise the importance of precise language that is shared across biological disciplines, as clear communication is foundational in integrating behaviour into physiology. Our goal with this Commentary is to set the stage for a debate and persuade readers of the merits of including behaviour within the domain of animal physiology. We argue that recognising behaviour as a physiological process is crucial for advancing a unified understanding of physiology, especially in the context of anthropogenic impacts.

Journal of Experimental BiologyVol. 227(22)
University of Antwerp (BE), University of Otago (NZ), James Cook University (AU)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vlaamse regering
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Physiological and biochemical adaptations
2.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bridging the divide in organismal physiology: a case for the integration of behaviour as a physiological process — Shamil F. Debaere, April Grace R. Opinion, et al. · Journal of Experimental Biology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS