Pan-Asian Decolonization? Iranian Oil, Japanese Tankers, and the Nisshomaru Incident of 1953

Abstract: This article explores the shared desire for economic emancipation in Iran and Japan and its limitations at the moment of global decolonization, which coincided with Mohammad Mosaddeq’s oil nationalization movement ( 1951–53 ) and Japan’s recovery of sovereignty ( 1952 ). It does so by studying the case of the 1953 Nisshomaru Incident, when the Japanese oil company Idemitsu violated the British-imposed embargo of Iranian oil. Despite Japan’s recent imperial past, the rhetoric of emancipation resonated precisely because of the fresh memory of the Allied occupation of Japan among businesspersons and bureaucrats, who shifted emphasis from, yet did not completely depart from, the pre- 1945 discourse of pan-Asianism. Using Persian and Japanese sources, I show that, while both Iran and Japan acted on their perceived national interest, their shared political feeling to challenge the Euro-America-centered international order made their transnational coordination possible.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of world history
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2024.a943170
Primary Topic
Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pan-Asian Decolonization? Iranian Oil, Japanese Tankers, and the Nisshomaru Incident of 1953

Mikiya Koyagi
Journal of world history
Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
article

Pan-Asian Decolonization? Iranian Oil, Japanese Tankers, and the Nisshomaru Incident of 1953

Mikiya Koyagi
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This article explores the shared desire for economic emancipation in Iran and Japan and its limitations at the moment of global decolonization, which coincided with Mohammad Mosaddeq’s oil nationalization movement ( 1951–53 ) and Japan’s recovery of sovereignty ( 1952 ). It does so by studying the case of the 1953 Nisshomaru Incident, when the Japanese oil company Idemitsu violated the British-imposed embargo of Iranian oil. Despite Japan’s recent imperial past, the rhetoric of emancipation resonated precisely because of the fresh memory of the Allied occupation of Japan among businesspersons and bureaucrats, who shifted emphasis from, yet did not completely depart from, the pre- 1945 discourse of pan-Asianism. Using Persian and Japanese sources, I show that, while both Iran and Japan acted on their perceived national interest, their shared political feeling to challenge the Euro-America-centered international order made their transnational coordination possible.

Journal of world historyVol. 35(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.