The Effects of Incubation, Fixation Stimuli, and Working Memory Capacity on Design Fixation

Abstract This paper examines design fixation in engineering classrooms, particularly focusing on the impact of incubation, fixation stimuli, and individual working memory capacity.146 first year engineering design students completed a presented design challenge under different experimental conditions. Their sketched solutions were evaluated using established fixation metrics. The results suggest no correlation between students’ working memory capacity and the percentage of example features integrated into their solutions. Results indicate that when students are presented with only a negative example, fixation levels are influenced by the length of the incubation period. Based on these results, instructors can be advised to present negative examples to students 96 hours before ideation to mitigate the inclusion of excessive negative example features. Furthermore, results show a significant increase in fixation on features present in positive examples, suggesting that instructors should be aware of presenting both positive and negative examples to their students if they want to avoid design fixation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2024-143871
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effects of Incubation, Fixation Stimuli, and Working Memory Capacity on Design Fixation

Jessica Menold, Elizabeth Starkey, Kathryn Jablokow, Nicolás F. Soria Zurita et al.
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
article

The Effects of Incubation, Fixation Stimuli, and Working Memory Capacity on Design Fixation

Jessica Menold, Elizabeth Starkey, Kathryn Jablokow, Nicolás F. Soria Zurita, Aaron Brundage
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines design fixation in engineering classrooms, particularly focusing on the impact of incubation, fixation stimuli, and individual working memory capacity.146 first year engineering design students completed a presented design challenge under different experimental conditions. Their sketched solutions were evaluated using established fixation metrics. The results suggest no correlation between students’ working memory capacity and the percentage of example features integrated into their solutions. Results indicate that when students are presented with only a negative example, fixation levels are influenced by the length of the incubation period. Based on these results, instructors can be advised to present negative examples to students 96 hours before ideation to mitigate the inclusion of excessive negative example features. Furthermore, results show a significant increase in fixation on features present in positive examples, suggesting that instructors should be aware of presenting both positive and negative examples to their students if they want to avoid design fixation.

Pennsylvania State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Effects of Incubation, Fixation Stimuli, and Working Memory Capacity on Design Fixation — Jessica Menold, Elizabeth Starkey, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS