Assessing Pedestrian Trust in Autonomous Vehicles: a Comparative Study of Immersive Virtual Reality and Non-Immersive Video Media

Abstract Trust is crucial for integrating autonomous vehicles (AVs) into society, with various studies examining pedestrian trust through methods like images, texts, videos, virtual reality (VR), and field studies. The impact of these representational methods on trust assessment remains uncertain. Our study conducted a 2 (media types: VR vs. video) by 7 (vehicle behavior trials) within-subject experiment with 50 adults to compare pedestrian trust, risk perception, and comprehensibility in immersive VR and non-immersive video settings. The results showed VR enhanced subjective judgments like trust and risk perception in general, even though participants’ understanding of vehicle behaviors is statistically the same. In addition, representing scenarios in an immersive VR or non-immersive video environment does not influence the relative effectiveness of vehicle behaviors on the trust assessment. The findings indicate the necessity of selecting appropriate media in trust studies depending on the research purpose (e.g., general assessment vs. comparative effectiveness) and validate the use of non-immersive video media to compare trust differences due to vehicle behavior variations. This research provides guidance for future AV-pedestrian trust studies in media type selection, particularly for meta-analyses aiming to consolidate findings from varied research by highlighting the critical role of media choice in trust assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2024-140007
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Pedestrian Trust in Autonomous Vehicles: a Comparative Study of Immersive Virtual Reality and Non-Immersive Video Media

Marufa Islam, Jinjuan She, James R. Chagdes
1 citations
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
0.53
article

Assessing Pedestrian Trust in Autonomous Vehicles: a Comparative Study of Immersive Virtual Reality and Non-Immersive Video Media

Marufa Islam, Jinjuan She, James R. Chagdes
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Trust is crucial for integrating autonomous vehicles (AVs) into society, with various studies examining pedestrian trust through methods like images, texts, videos, virtual reality (VR), and field studies. The impact of these representational methods on trust assessment remains uncertain. Our study conducted a 2 (media types: VR vs. video) by 7 (vehicle behavior trials) within-subject experiment with 50 adults to compare pedestrian trust, risk perception, and comprehensibility in immersive VR and non-immersive video settings. The results showed VR enhanced subjective judgments like trust and risk perception in general, even though participants’ understanding of vehicle behaviors is statistically the same. In addition, representing scenarios in an immersive VR or non-immersive video environment does not influence the relative effectiveness of vehicle behaviors on the trust assessment. The findings indicate the necessity of selecting appropriate media in trust studies depending on the research purpose (e.g., general assessment vs. comparative effectiveness) and validate the use of non-immersive video media to compare trust differences due to vehicle behavior variations. This research provides guidance for future AV-pedestrian trust studies in media type selection, particularly for meta-analyses aiming to consolidate findings from varied research by highlighting the critical role of media choice in trust assessments.

Miami University (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.