Maximizing <scp>STEM</scp> resources for diplomats: A framework for speed, depth, and accuracy

Abstract In the evolving landscape of science diplomacy, frontline diplomats increasingly rely on effective access to STEM knowledge to advance national interests and address global challenges. This paper presents a framework organizations can use for evaluating the approaches and tools available to their frontline diplomats, focusing on three key metrics: response time (speed), content depth and applicability, and consistency in accuracy. By evaluating tools via these metrics, the framework highlights the need for mechanisms that offer quick access to in‐depth and reliable STEM information, thus optimizing diplomatic effectiveness. The study provides examples from the US foreign affairs perspective within categories such as web searches, training programs, and consulting services, identifying opportunities for innovation and improvement. Identifying tools that maximize speed, depth, and accuracy, this framework aims to guide organizations in refining their resources, thereby equipping diplomats with the tools necessary to navigate complex, science‐driven global issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Policy
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13468
Citations
3
Primary Topic
International Science and Diplomacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maximizing STEM resources for diplomats: A framework for speed, depth, and accuracy

Lee E. Voth‐Gaeddert
3 citations
Global Policy
International Science and Diplomacy
6.69
article

Maximizing STEM resources for diplomats: A framework for speed, depth, and accuracy

Lee E. Voth‐Gaeddert
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract In the evolving landscape of science diplomacy, frontline diplomats increasingly rely on effective access to STEM knowledge to advance national interests and address global challenges. This paper presents a framework organizations can use for evaluating the approaches and tools available to their frontline diplomats, focusing on three key metrics: response time (speed), content depth and applicability, and consistency in accuracy. By evaluating tools via these metrics, the framework highlights the need for mechanisms that offer quick access to in‐depth and reliable STEM information, thus optimizing diplomatic effectiveness. The study provides examples from the US foreign affairs perspective within categories such as web searches, training programs, and consulting services, identifying opportunities for innovation and improvement. Identifying tools that maximize speed, depth, and accuracy, this framework aims to guide organizations in refining their resources, thereby equipping diplomats with the tools necessary to navigate complex, science‐driven global issues.

Global PolicyVol. 16(1)
Arizona State University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
International Science and Diplomacy
6.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.