Energy inefficiency as a ‘poverty premium’

This paper presents the concept of energy inefficiency as a poverty premium. Whilst concepts of energy poverty, vulnerability, and justice have highlighted the uneven distribution and impacts of a lack of access to sufficient energy services, they do not fully capture how people who are already financially disadvantaged pay more as a result of energy inefficiency. We therefore draw on the well-established idea of the “poverty premium” – which has achieved significant political resonance in other policy areas – to highlight how the condition of energy inefficiency can cause people who are financially and materially disadvantaged by poverty to pay a range of premiums. We identify several mechanisms via which these premiums arise: tenure; affordability; finance; investment; behaviour; and policy. Whilst we focus on detailed examples from England (United Kingdom), we also show how energy inefficiency-related poverty premiums are widely applicable across diverse contexts. We argue that the concept is accessible to a wide range of stakeholders, directly addressing key sites of unfairness and injustice in domestic energy efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103824
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy inefficiency as a ‘poverty premium’

Caitlin Robinson, Sara Davies, Jamie Evans
5 citations
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy and Environment Impacts
0.66
article

Energy inefficiency as a ‘poverty premium’

Caitlin Robinson, Sara Davies, Jamie Evans
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This paper presents the concept of energy inefficiency as a poverty premium. Whilst concepts of energy poverty, vulnerability, and justice have highlighted the uneven distribution and impacts of a lack of access to sufficient energy services, they do not fully capture how people who are already financially disadvantaged pay more as a result of energy inefficiency. We therefore draw on the well-established idea of the “poverty premium” – which has achieved significant political resonance in other policy areas – to highlight how the condition of energy inefficiency can cause people who are financially and materially disadvantaged by poverty to pay a range of premiums. We identify several mechanisms via which these premiums arise: tenure; affordability; finance; investment; behaviour; and policy. Whilst we focus on detailed examples from England (United Kingdom), we also show how energy inefficiency-related poverty premiums are widely applicable across diverse contexts. We argue that the concept is accessible to a wide range of stakeholders, directly addressing key sites of unfairness and injustice in domestic energy efficiency.

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 118
University of Bristol (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Barrow Cadbury Trust, Medical Research Council
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Energy and Environment Impacts
0.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Energy inefficiency as a ‘poverty premium’ — Caitlin Robinson, Sara Davies, et al. · Energy Research & Social Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS