Legal status and refugees' perceptions of institutional justice: The role of communication quality

Abstract What factors influence refugees' perceptions of justice in bureaucratic institutions? As global migration movements draw increasing attention, migrants' experiences as constituents in destination countries merit further research. Drawing evidence from the 2018 survey of refugees participating in the German Socio‐Economic Panel, this article examines the role of legal status in shaping perceptions of justice at government offices. Our findings highlight a stark contrast: refugees with unstable legal statuses often perceive bureaucratic proceedings as less just compared to those with firmer legal standings. However, refugees' perceptions of a more positive encounter their encounters with street‐level bureaucrats can act as a buffer against the negative effects of legal status on perceptions of justice at government offices. These insights underscore a pressing policy implication: asylum procedures, currently marked by ambiguity and delays, could benefit significantly from enhanced communication quality on the part of street‐level bureaucrats.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration Review
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13898
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal status and refugees' perceptions of institutional justice: The role of communication quality

Anton Nivorozhkin, Emily Frank
2 citations
Public Administration Review
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
2.26
article

Legal status and refugees' perceptions of institutional justice: The role of communication quality

Anton Nivorozhkin, Emily Frank
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract What factors influence refugees' perceptions of justice in bureaucratic institutions? As global migration movements draw increasing attention, migrants' experiences as constituents in destination countries merit further research. Drawing evidence from the 2018 survey of refugees participating in the German Socio‐Economic Panel, this article examines the role of legal status in shaping perceptions of justice at government offices. Our findings highlight a stark contrast: refugees with unstable legal statuses often perceive bureaucratic proceedings as less just compared to those with firmer legal standings. However, refugees' perceptions of a more positive encounter their encounters with street‐level bureaucrats can act as a buffer against the negative effects of legal status on perceptions of justice at government offices. These insights underscore a pressing policy implication: asylum procedures, currently marked by ambiguity and delays, could benefit significantly from enhanced communication quality on the part of street‐level bureaucrats.

Public Administration ReviewVol. 85(4)
Hertie School (DE), Institut für Arbeitsmarkt und Berufsforschung (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Legal status and refugees' perceptions of institutional justice: The role of communication quality — Anton Nivorozhkin, Emily Frank · Public Administration Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS