Evaluation of 100% alternative fuel combustion under oxyfuel conditions in a pilot-scale burner for application in retrofit oxyfuel cement kiln

• Stable oxyfuel combustion of solid recovered fuel, wood and wood sludge mixture. • Alternative fuels oxyfuel flames are wider, longer and less intense than that of coal. • Impact of oxyfuel recirculation ratio on heat flux compared to coal air case. • Solid recovered fuel oxy-combustion CFD model validated with experimental data. The cement industry is one of the largest industrial CO 2 emitters, where CO 2 is emitted from combustion and clinker production processes. This study focuses on substituting fossil fuels with alternative fuels under oxyfuel conditions to advance the technical feasibility of carbon capture technology. Combustion tests are performed in a 300 kW pilot-scale facility, where the burner has been optimized to replicate a retrofit oxyfuel cement kiln burner. Coal combustion in air is the reference case for the tests. The alternative fuels used in the tests are solid recovered fuel (SRF), wood and co-combustion of 90 % th wood − 10 % th sludge. Combustion scenarios are studied under both air and oxyfuel conditions with two different flue gas recirculation ratios (RR). Axial measurements of the flame temperature, heat flux and concentrations of gases are measured and evaluated. The burner and combustion chamber are modeled with CFD simulations. The boundary conditions of the SRF combustion in both air and oxyfuel conditions are modeled and the results are validated with the corresponding experimental data. The O 2 and CO 2 concentration during combustion of alternative fuels under oxyfuel conditions, measured 300 cm from the burner, are on average 3 ± 2 vol-% and 82 ± 5 vol-%, respectively. The average heat flux for the alternative fuels, 33 cm from the burner, is 122 ± 15 kW/m 2 and increases to form a plateau between 100 and 200 cm from the burner at 177 ± 16 kW/m 2 . Compared to coal, the used alternative fuels are milled to a larger particle size, have on average 3.3 times higher volatile matter content, have faster devolatilization rates and have a longer flame shape. The oxyfuel case with higher RR resembles the air case in terms of the temperature profile, heat flux profile and inlet gas momentum. The combustion of alternative fuels is stable in both air and oxyfuel conditions and the flames compared to coal are wider, longer and less intense. CFD simulations of the prototype burner are conducted and validated against experimental data for 100 % SRF combustion. The model offers useful insight into the combustion of SRF fuel, it is particularly accurate for conventional air operating conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133697
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of 100% alternative fuel combustion under oxyfuel conditions in a pilot-scale burner for application in retrofit oxyfuel cement kiln

Günter Scheffknecht, Cynthia Kroumian, J. Maier, Konstantina Peloriadi et al.
3 citations
Fuel
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
0.55
article

Evaluation of 100% alternative fuel combustion under oxyfuel conditions in a pilot-scale burner for application in retrofit oxyfuel cement kiln

Günter Scheffknecht, Cynthia Kroumian, J. Maier, Konstantina Peloriadi, Panagiotis Grammelis
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Stable oxyfuel combustion of solid recovered fuel, wood and wood sludge mixture. • Alternative fuels oxyfuel flames are wider, longer and less intense than that of coal. • Impact of oxyfuel recirculation ratio on heat flux compared to coal air case. • Solid recovered fuel oxy-combustion CFD model validated with experimental data. The cement industry is one of the largest industrial CO 2 emitters, where CO 2 is emitted from combustion and clinker production processes. This study focuses on substituting fossil fuels with alternative fuels under oxyfuel conditions to advance the technical feasibility of carbon capture technology. Combustion tests are performed in a 300 kW pilot-scale facility, where the burner has been optimized to replicate a retrofit oxyfuel cement kiln burner. Coal combustion in air is the reference case for the tests. The alternative fuels used in the tests are solid recovered fuel (SRF), wood and co-combustion of 90 % th wood − 10 % th sludge. Combustion scenarios are studied under both air and oxyfuel conditions with two different flue gas recirculation ratios (RR). Axial measurements of the flame temperature, heat flux and concentrations of gases are measured and evaluated. The burner and combustion chamber are modeled with CFD simulations. The boundary conditions of the SRF combustion in both air and oxyfuel conditions are modeled and the results are validated with the corresponding experimental data. The O 2 and CO 2 concentration during combustion of alternative fuels under oxyfuel conditions, measured 300 cm from the burner, are on average 3 ± 2 vol-% and 82 ± 5 vol-%, respectively. The average heat flux for the alternative fuels, 33 cm from the burner, is 122 ± 15 kW/m 2 and increases to form a plateau between 100 and 200 cm from the burner at 177 ± 16 kW/m 2 . Compared to coal, the used alternative fuels are milled to a larger particle size, have on average 3.3 times higher volatile matter content, have faster devolatilization rates and have a longer flame shape. The oxyfuel case with higher RR resembles the air case in terms of the temperature profile, heat flux profile and inlet gas momentum. The combustion of alternative fuels is stable in both air and oxyfuel conditions and the flames compared to coal are wider, longer and less intense. CFD simulations of the prototype burner are conducted and validated against experimental data for 100 % SRF combustion. The model offers useful insight into the combustion of SRF fuel, it is particularly accurate for conventional air operating conditions.

FuelVol. 381
University of Stuttgart (DE), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (GR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
0.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.