A New Method for Measuring Cognition in Children With Sagittal Craniosynostosis

Objectives: The neurocognitive profile of patients who have undergone spring-assisted surgery (SAS) for craniosynostosis is not well understood, and a variety of different cognitive measures have been used across various studies. Although neuropsychological evaluations can document cognitive strengths and weaknesses across a number of cognitive areas, they can be time consuming. This study aimed to: (1) describe the neurocognitive profile of patients who underwent SAS using both a common intelligence measure and iPad assisted testing measuring several cognitive areas, as well as parent ratings; (2) better understand the feasibility and utility of using iPad assisted assessments in this population. Methods: Thirty-six patients between the ages of 6 and 18 with sagittal synostosis who underwent SAS participated in a brief battery of assessments including a measure of abbreviated IQ, National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIH Toolbox), and caregiver ratings on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function – Second Edition (BRIEF-2). Statistical analyses assessed performance within the group and between measures. Results: Positive correlations were found between all 3 NIH Toolbox Composite scores and abbreviated IQ. Five of 7 subtests were positively correlated with Full Scale IQ, while 4 of 7 were positively correlated with both verbal and visual reasoning indices. Negative correlations between the Crystallized Composite score and BRIEF-2 were found for 8 of 9 BRIEF-2 subscales. Three of 9 BRIEF-2 subscales were negatively correlated with Fluid Composite and Total Composite scores. Conclusions: Cognitive data were generally aligned with the normal distribution curve. Although caregiver ratings yielded several executive functioning concerns, significant correlations were found with composite scores and a few specific subtests. Use of the NIH Toolbox was feasible in this population and shows promise as a tool for measuring a range of different cognitive domains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FACE
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/27325016241299005
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A New Method for Measuring Cognition in Children With Sagittal Craniosynostosis

Lia K. Thibodaux, Christopher M. Runyan, Lisa R. David, Daniel E. Couture et al.
1 citations
FACE
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
0.55
article

A New Method for Measuring Cognition in Children With Sagittal Craniosynostosis

Lia K. Thibodaux, Christopher M. Runyan, Lisa R. David, Daniel E. Couture, Leah Chapman, Avery Wright
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objectives: The neurocognitive profile of patients who have undergone spring-assisted surgery (SAS) for craniosynostosis is not well understood, and a variety of different cognitive measures have been used across various studies. Although neuropsychological evaluations can document cognitive strengths and weaknesses across a number of cognitive areas, they can be time consuming. This study aimed to: (1) describe the neurocognitive profile of patients who underwent SAS using both a common intelligence measure and iPad assisted testing measuring several cognitive areas, as well as parent ratings; (2) better understand the feasibility and utility of using iPad assisted assessments in this population. Methods: Thirty-six patients between the ages of 6 and 18 with sagittal synostosis who underwent SAS participated in a brief battery of assessments including a measure of abbreviated IQ, National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIH Toolbox), and caregiver ratings on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function – Second Edition (BRIEF-2). Statistical analyses assessed performance within the group and between measures. Results: Positive correlations were found between all 3 NIH Toolbox Composite scores and abbreviated IQ. Five of 7 subtests were positively correlated with Full Scale IQ, while 4 of 7 were positively correlated with both verbal and visual reasoning indices. Negative correlations between the Crystallized Composite score and BRIEF-2 were found for 8 of 9 BRIEF-2 subscales. Three of 9 BRIEF-2 subscales were negatively correlated with Fluid Composite and Total Composite scores. Conclusions: Cognitive data were generally aligned with the normal distribution curve. Although caregiver ratings yielded several executive functioning concerns, significant correlations were found with composite scores and a few specific subtests. Use of the NIH Toolbox was feasible in this population and shows promise as a tool for measuring a range of different cognitive domains.

FACEVol. 6(1)
Wake Forest University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
0.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.