Comparison of four upscaling methods to drive instantaneous evapotranspiration to daily values for maize in two climatic regions in China

Abstract Accurately converting satellite instantaneous evapotranspiration ( λET i ) over time to daily evapotranspiration ( λET d ) is crucial for estimating regional evapotranspiration from remote sensing satellites, which plays an important role in effective water resource management. In this study, four upscaling methods based on the principle of energy balance, including the evaporative fraction method ( Eva-f method), revised evaporative fraction method ( R-Eva-f method), crop coefficient method ( K c -ET 0 method) and direct canopy resistance method ( Direct-r c method), were validated based on the measured data of the Bowen ratio energy balance system ( BREB ) in maize fields in northwestern (NW) and northeastern (NE) China (semi-arid and semi-humid continental climate regions) from 2021 to 2023. Results indicated that Eva-f and R-Eva-f methods were superior to K c -ET 0 and Direct-r c methods in both climatic regions and performed better between 10:00 and 11:00, with mean absolute errors ( MAE ) and coefficient of efficiency ( ɛ ) reaching <10 W/m 2 and > 0.91, respectively. Comprehensive evaluation of the optimal upscaling time using global performance indicators ( GPI ) showed that the Eva-f method had the highest GPI of 0.59 at 12:00 for the NW, while the R-Eva-f method had the highest GPI of 1.18 at 11:00 for the NE. As a result, the Eva-f approach is recommended as the best way for upscaling evapotranspiration in NW, with 12:00 being the ideal upscaling time. The R-Eva-f method is the optimum upscaling method for the Northeast area, with an ideal upscaling time of 11:00. The comprehensive results of this study could be useful for converting λET i to λET d .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Agricultural Science
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021859624000637
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of four upscaling methods to drive instantaneous evapotranspiration to daily values for maize in two climatic regions in China

Hexiang Zheng, Rui Zhou, Run Xue, Beibei Hao et al.
8 citations
The Journal of Agricultural Science
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
2.26
article

Comparison of four upscaling methods to drive instantaneous evapotranspiration to daily values for maize in two climatic regions in China

Hexiang Zheng, Rui Zhou, Run Xue, Beibei Hao, Yudong Zhou, Biyu Wang, Xuanxuan Wang, Guoqing Wang, Chuan Zhang, Jianyun Zhang, Jun Li, Bin He, Yujing Han, Haofang Yan, Rongxuan Bao
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Accurately converting satellite instantaneous evapotranspiration ( λET i ) over time to daily evapotranspiration ( λET d ) is crucial for estimating regional evapotranspiration from remote sensing satellites, which plays an important role in effective water resource management. In this study, four upscaling methods based on the principle of energy balance, including the evaporative fraction method ( Eva-f method), revised evaporative fraction method ( R-Eva-f method), crop coefficient method ( K c -ET 0 method) and direct canopy resistance method ( Direct-r c method), were validated based on the measured data of the Bowen ratio energy balance system ( BREB ) in maize fields in northwestern (NW) and northeastern (NE) China (semi-arid and semi-humid continental climate regions) from 2021 to 2023. Results indicated that Eva-f and R-Eva-f methods were superior to K c -ET 0 and Direct-r c methods in both climatic regions and performed better between 10:00 and 11:00, with mean absolute errors ( MAE ) and coefficient of efficiency ( ɛ ) reaching <10 W/m 2 and > 0.91, respectively. Comprehensive evaluation of the optimal upscaling time using global performance indicators ( GPI ) showed that the Eva-f method had the highest GPI of 0.59 at 12:00 for the NW, while the R-Eva-f method had the highest GPI of 1.18 at 11:00 for the NE. As a result, the Eva-f approach is recommended as the best way for upscaling evapotranspiration in NW, with 12:00 being the ideal upscaling time. The R-Eva-f method is the optimum upscaling method for the Northeast area, with an ideal upscaling time of 11:00. The comprehensive results of this study could be useful for converting λET i to λET d .

The Journal of Agricultural ScienceVol. 162(6)
Jiangsu University (CN), China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (CN), State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering (CN), Guangdong Academy of Sciences (CN), Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute (CN)
Northwestern University, University of Cambridge
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.