Variation in adherence measures as a function of calculation methods
Differences among the three methods confirm the importance of the adherence definition. TIMING may underestimate medicinal effects because patients may take medication as instructed (e.g., with meals) rather than at fixed intervals. PILLCOUNT may overestimate adherence by not accounting for inconsistent use. DAILY may best provide daily estimates of correct administration. Higher variability for TIMING may indicate patients are more likely to vary time between doses. Adherence calculation methods are important in interpreting results. Variability measures provide a more complete picture of adherence and may raise the likelihood of effects on biological outcomes. We propose studies of adherence include calculation method in the definition of adherence.
Authors
- Jacqueline Dunbar‐Jacob (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7216-9057)
- Jeffrey M. Rohay
Institutions
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Pharmacology
- Published
- 2024-11-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1460327
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.01
Funders
- National Institutes of Health