Evaluating Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement on Pectus Carinatum Severity and Treatment Outcomes: A Comparison of Subjective and Objective Assessment Methods

Subjective assessment of PC severity and esthetic results is inconsistent. Three-dimensional scanning could help standardize treatment completion and aid patients and surgeons in determining treatment completion. The psychosocial effects of scars should be addressed when discussing treatment options.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Pediatric Surgery
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2466-6407
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement on Pectus Carinatum Severity and Treatment Outcomes: A Comparison of Subjective and Objective Assessment Methods

Sjoerd A. de Beer, Sander Zwaveling, Hendrik van Braak, Matthijs W. Oomen et al.
2 citations
European Journal of Pediatric Surgery
Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
1.15
article

Evaluating Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement on Pectus Carinatum Severity and Treatment Outcomes: A Comparison of Subjective and Objective Assessment Methods

Sjoerd A. de Beer, Sander Zwaveling, Hendrik van Braak, Matthijs W. Oomen, Ernst van Heurn, Justin R. de Jong
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Subjective assessment of PC severity and esthetic results is inconsistent. Three-dimensional scanning could help standardize treatment completion and aid patients and surgeons in determining treatment completion. The psychosocial effects of scars should be addressed when discussing treatment options.

European Journal of Pediatric SurgeryVol. 35(03)
Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.