Continuous improvement strategies towards energy transition: The importance of individual employees' entrepreneurial orientation and learning processes

Abstract At one hand, while research on entrepreneurial orientation (EO) continues to proliferate, only recently has attention been drawn to the individual entrepreneurial orientation (IEO) level. On the other hand, although organizational learning (OL) explains how organizations explore and exploit knowledge to enhance their innovation and performance, limited research has investigated the relationship between EO and OL. In this study, we develop and empirically test in an established Canadian energy provider a framework on the IEO‐OL‐performance relationship. We find that employees' innovative orientation and risk‐taking propensity are more positively related to exploratory learning, while proactive employees are more geared towards exploitative learning. We further unveil that exploitative learning is more positively related to continuous improvement than explorative learning. Our findings add to scant literature on the IEO‐OL‐performance relationship and provide managerial insights for energy sector firms on how IEO can assist with their transformational business strategies towards green and clean energy supply.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4026
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Continuous improvement strategies towards energy transition: The importance of individual employees' entrepreneurial orientation and learning processes

Jeffrey J. McNally, Panagiotis Piperopoulos, David Foord, Eduardo Jimenez‐Moro et al.
4 citations
Business Strategy and the Environment
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
2.92
article

Continuous improvement strategies towards energy transition: The importance of individual employees' entrepreneurial orientation and learning processes

Jeffrey J. McNally, Panagiotis Piperopoulos, David Foord, Eduardo Jimenez‐Moro, Maha Mohamed Tantawy
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract At one hand, while research on entrepreneurial orientation (EO) continues to proliferate, only recently has attention been drawn to the individual entrepreneurial orientation (IEO) level. On the other hand, although organizational learning (OL) explains how organizations explore and exploit knowledge to enhance their innovation and performance, limited research has investigated the relationship between EO and OL. In this study, we develop and empirically test in an established Canadian energy provider a framework on the IEO‐OL‐performance relationship. We find that employees' innovative orientation and risk‐taking propensity are more positively related to exploratory learning, while proactive employees are more geared towards exploitative learning. We further unveil that exploitative learning is more positively related to continuous improvement than explorative learning. Our findings add to scant literature on the IEO‐OL‐performance relationship and provide managerial insights for energy sector firms on how IEO can assist with their transformational business strategies towards green and clean energy supply.

Business Strategy and the EnvironmentVol. 34(1)
University of New Brunswick (CA), La Trobe University (AU), University of Windsor (CA)
Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
2.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.