Influence of Ocean Currents on Wave Modeling and Satellite Observations: Insights From the One Ocean Expedition

Abstract This study investigates the influence of ocean currents on wave modeling and satellite observations using in situ wave measurements from the One Ocean Expedition 2021–2023. In January 2023, six OpenMetBuoy drifters were deployed in the Agulhas Current region. Their high immersion ratio minimized wind effects, allowing them to follow the current and return to the Indian Ocean by the Agulhas retroflection, collecting data for about 2 months. Comparing surface current velocities from both the Mercator model and Globcurrent product with drifter data reveals underestimation for velocities over with Mercator showing greater variability. Significant wave height and Stokes drift parameters from MFWAM and ERA5 were also evaluated against drifters. Both models tend to overestimate Stokes drift more noticeable in ERA5, indicating sensitivity to wind seas. For significant wave height, both models agree well with drifter measurements with correlations of 0.90 for MFWAM and 0.83 for ERA5. However, ERA5's lack of surface current data combined with its coarse resolution (0.5) lead to underestimation of wave heights exceeding 2.5 m. MFWAM products including and excluding currents exhibit root mean square errors of 0.39 and 0.45 m, respectively, when compared to drifter measurements. This confirms that neglecting currents introduces additional errors particularly in areas with sharp current gradients. Analyzing MFWAM wave spectra, including and excluding currents, reveals wave energy transfer attributed to wave‐current interactions. The spatial extent of these interactions is captured by satellite altimeters, revealing wave modulations with considerable wave height variations when waves cross eddies and the current core.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jc021581
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Ocean Currents on Wave Modeling and Satellite Observations: Insights From the One Ocean Expedition

Marc Naeije, Pieter Visser, Ourania Altiparmaki, Gaute Hope et al.
7 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
3.37
article

Influence of Ocean Currents on Wave Modeling and Satellite Observations: Insights From the One Ocean Expedition

Marc Naeije, Pieter Visser, Ourania Altiparmaki, Gaute Hope, Johnny A. Johannessen, Craig Donlon, Øyvind Breivik, Patrik Bohlinger, Fabrice Collard, Lotfi Aouf
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the influence of ocean currents on wave modeling and satellite observations using in situ wave measurements from the One Ocean Expedition 2021–2023. In January 2023, six OpenMetBuoy drifters were deployed in the Agulhas Current region. Their high immersion ratio minimized wind effects, allowing them to follow the current and return to the Indian Ocean by the Agulhas retroflection, collecting data for about 2 months. Comparing surface current velocities from both the Mercator model and Globcurrent product with drifter data reveals underestimation for velocities over with Mercator showing greater variability. Significant wave height and Stokes drift parameters from MFWAM and ERA5 were also evaluated against drifters. Both models tend to overestimate Stokes drift more noticeable in ERA5, indicating sensitivity to wind seas. For significant wave height, both models agree well with drifter measurements with correlations of 0.90 for MFWAM and 0.83 for ERA5. However, ERA5's lack of surface current data combined with its coarse resolution (0.5) lead to underestimation of wave heights exceeding 2.5 m. MFWAM products including and excluding currents exhibit root mean square errors of 0.39 and 0.45 m, respectively, when compared to drifter measurements. This confirms that neglecting currents introduces additional errors particularly in areas with sharp current gradients. Analyzing MFWAM wave spectra, including and excluding currents, reveals wave energy transfer attributed to wave‐current interactions. The spatial extent of these interactions is captured by satellite altimeters, revealing wave modulations with considerable wave height variations when waves cross eddies and the current core.

Journal of Geophysical Research OceansVol. 129(11)
Norwegian Meteorological Institute (NO), Météo-France (FR), Océanopolis (FR), Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center (NO), University of Bergen (NO), European Space Research and Technology Centre (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, European Space Agency
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
3.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.