Finding limiting rods for dry storage analyses

• Novel methodology for identifying limiting rods BWR rods for dry storage is proposed. • Limiting rods are identified based on reactor operation data without requiring time-consuming fuel performance calculations. • The methodology reduced the number of rods requiring detailed analysis from over 67,000 to 36. • Falcon and HYPE simulations of the limiting rods revealed that rod integrity is not compromised during dry storage. Fuel rod status during reactor operation must be numerically modeled before dry storage analyses. Simulating all the rods ever irradiated in Switzerland with state-of-the-art best estimate tools would be too time consuming. The goal of this study is to develop a methodology for identifying limiting BWR rods, where the criterion of limiting is the rod internal pressure. Limiting rods are those whose parameters may challenge rod integrity during dry storage, subsequent transport, or handling. The presence of radial hydrides is of particular importance. The precipitation of radially oriented hydrides is associated with strong tensile hoop stress of the cladding. This can be a consequence of high rod internal pressure which has been chosen the limiting parameter. In the first step, the 3D core simulators provide irradiation data. Then, the core simulator results along with rod geometrical parameters are submitted to the principal component analysis. The multidimensional datasets are reduced to 2D and processed by a clustering algorithm or not, depending on the assembly design. The limiting rods are identified for each batch or cluster and simulated with the fuel performance code Falcon and the hydrogen behavior code HYPE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Nuclear Energy
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2024.111043
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Finding limiting rods for dry storage analyses

C. Cozzo, Grigori Khvostov, Hakim Ferroukhi, Alexey Cherezov et al.
1 citations
Annals of Nuclear Energy
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
1.30
article

Finding limiting rods for dry storage analyses

C. Cozzo, Grigori Khvostov, Hakim Ferroukhi, Alexey Cherezov, Piotr Konarski
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Novel methodology for identifying limiting rods BWR rods for dry storage is proposed. • Limiting rods are identified based on reactor operation data without requiring time-consuming fuel performance calculations. • The methodology reduced the number of rods requiring detailed analysis from over 67,000 to 36. • Falcon and HYPE simulations of the limiting rods revealed that rod integrity is not compromised during dry storage. Fuel rod status during reactor operation must be numerically modeled before dry storage analyses. Simulating all the rods ever irradiated in Switzerland with state-of-the-art best estimate tools would be too time consuming. The goal of this study is to develop a methodology for identifying limiting BWR rods, where the criterion of limiting is the rod internal pressure. Limiting rods are those whose parameters may challenge rod integrity during dry storage, subsequent transport, or handling. The presence of radial hydrides is of particular importance. The precipitation of radially oriented hydrides is associated with strong tensile hoop stress of the cladding. This can be a consequence of high rod internal pressure which has been chosen the limiting parameter. In the first step, the 3D core simulators provide irradiation data. Then, the core simulator results along with rod geometrical parameters are submitted to the principal component analysis. The multidimensional datasets are reduced to 2D and processed by a clustering algorithm or not, depending on the assembly design. The limiting rods are identified for each batch or cluster and simulated with the fuel performance code Falcon and the hydrogen behavior code HYPE.

Annals of Nuclear EnergyVol. 212
Paul Scherrer Institute (CH)
Eidgenössisches Nuklearsicherheitsinspektorat
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.