Adult Sex‐Ratio Bias Does Not Lead to Detectable Adaptive Offspring Sex Allocation Via Nest‐Site Choice in a Turtle With Temperature‐Dependent Sex Determination

Sex-ratio theory predicts that parents can optimise their fitness by producing offspring of the rare sex, yet there is a dearth of empirical evidence for adaptive sex allocation in response to the adult sex ratio (ASR). This is concerning, as anthropogenic disruption of the sex ratios of reproductive individuals threatens to cause demographic collapse in animal populations. Species with environmental sex determination (ESD) are especially at risk but may possess the capacity to adaptively influence offspring sex via control over the developmental environment. For example, reptiles with temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) could conceivably choose nest sites with thermal characteristics that produce offspring of the rare sex. To test this hypothesis, we seeded three secure outdoor ponds with different sex ratios (~M:F 3:1, 1:1, and 1:3) of adult painted turtles (<i>Chrysemys picta</i>), a reptile species with TSD. We then quantified nesting traits that could influence nest temperature and thus offspring sex ratio, including nesting date, nest depth, and nest canopy cover. We found no directional relationship between the ASR treatments and any measured nest traits and thus rejected our hypothesis. Interestingly, increased maternal body size was associated with reduced nest canopy cover, and this trend was more pronounced in the biased ASR treatments. If adaptive sex allocation occurs in this system, it instead may manifest via maternal epigenetic predisposition of offspring sex or in response to a phenomenon other than the ASR.