Robustness of divergence time estimation despite gene tree estimation error: a case study of fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae)

Genomic data have become ubiquitous in phylogenomic studies, including divergence time estimation, but provide new challenges. These challenges include, among others, biological gene tree discordance, methodological gene tree estimation error, and computational limitations on performing full Bayesian inference under complex models. In this study, we use a recently published firefly (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) anchored hybrid enrichment data set (AHE; 436 loci for 88 Lampyridae species and 10 outgroup species) as a case study to explore gene tree estimation error and the robustness of divergence time estimation. First, we explored the amount of model violation using posterior predictive simulations because model violations are likely to bias phylogenetic inferences and produce gene tree estimation error. We specifically focused on missing data (either uniformly distributed or systematically) and the distribution of highly variable and conserved sites (either uniformly distributed or clustered). Our assessment of model adequacy showed that standard phylogenetic substitution models are not adequate for any of the 436 AHE loci. We tested if the model violations and alignment errors resulted indeed in gene tree estimation error by comparing the observed gene tree discordance to simulated gene tree discordance under the multispecies coalescent model. Thus, we show that the inferred gene tree discordance is not only due to biological mechanism but primarily due to inference errors. Lastly, we explored if divergence time estimation is robust despite the observed gene tree estimation error. We selected four subsets of the full AHE data set, concatenated each subset and performed a Bayesian relaxed clock divergence estimation in RevBayes. The estimated divergence times overlapped for all nodes that are shared between the topologies. Thus, divergence time estimation is robust using any well selected data subset as long as the topology inference is robust.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systematic Biology
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syae065
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Genetic diversity and population structure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robustness of divergence time estimation despite gene tree estimation error: a case study of fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae)

Pablo Duchen, Sebastian Höhna, Ana Catalán, Sarah E. Lower
10 citations
Systematic Biology
Genetic diversity and population structure
5.50
article

Robustness of divergence time estimation despite gene tree estimation error: a case study of fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae)

Pablo Duchen, Sebastian Höhna, Ana Catalán, Sarah E. Lower
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Genomic data have become ubiquitous in phylogenomic studies, including divergence time estimation, but provide new challenges. These challenges include, among others, biological gene tree discordance, methodological gene tree estimation error, and computational limitations on performing full Bayesian inference under complex models. In this study, we use a recently published firefly (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) anchored hybrid enrichment data set (AHE; 436 loci for 88 Lampyridae species and 10 outgroup species) as a case study to explore gene tree estimation error and the robustness of divergence time estimation. First, we explored the amount of model violation using posterior predictive simulations because model violations are likely to bias phylogenetic inferences and produce gene tree estimation error. We specifically focused on missing data (either uniformly distributed or systematically) and the distribution of highly variable and conserved sites (either uniformly distributed or clustered). Our assessment of model adequacy showed that standard phylogenetic substitution models are not adequate for any of the 436 AHE loci. We tested if the model violations and alignment errors resulted indeed in gene tree estimation error by comparing the observed gene tree discordance to simulated gene tree discordance under the multispecies coalescent model. Thus, we show that the inferred gene tree discordance is not only due to biological mechanism but primarily due to inference errors. Lastly, we explored if divergence time estimation is robust despite the observed gene tree estimation error. We selected four subsets of the full AHE data set, concatenated each subset and performed a Bayesian relaxed clock divergence estimation in RevBayes. The estimated divergence times overlapped for all nodes that are shared between the topologies. Thus, divergence time estimation is robust using any well selected data subset as long as the topology inference is robust.

Systematic BiologyVol. 74(2)
Bucknell University (US), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Genetic diversity and population structure
5.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.