Oral Presentations

Background: The Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) is used internationally as a selection tool for medical school admissions. The MMI is a series of short, one-on-one interviews that assess such attributes as communication, problem-solving, and teamwork skills [1,2]. This study investigated the predictive validity of the MMI for the following outcome measures: medical school performance (Educational Performance Measure [EPM], Situational Judgement Test [SJT], Prescribing Safety Assessment [PSA]) and passing professional membership exams in medicine (RCGP, MRCP, MRCS). The study included data from two medical schools in the UK.<br/>Methods: Data from 4990 doctors who graduated from UK medical schools and sat the first part of professional membership exams in 2017-2019 was used. The UK Medical Education Database[3] provided linked data from different sources, including medical school admissions, assessments, and postgraduate training. Multinomial logistic regression analyses estimated the odds of passing college membership exam on first attempt.<br/>Results and Conclusion: MMI was a significant predictor of medical school performance, even after controlling for other factors such as high school grades (UCAS scores) and clinical aptitude test (UCAT scores). The MMI was also a significant predictor of passing college exams on first attempt, but the effect size was smaller than for those assessments that occur nearer to postgraduate training - EPM, SJT, and PSA scores. The findings suggest that the MMI is a valid predictor of educational success in both medical school and postgraduate training. Although the proportion of variance explained by MMI and all other predictors is small, MMI remains a valuable tool for medical school admissions. In the absence of innovations that can improve prediction, medical schools should continue using MMI in combination with other factors, such as UCAS and UCAT scores, to make admissions decisions.<br/>

Publication Details

Journal
The Clinical Teacher
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13813
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Medical Education and Admissions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oral Presentations

1 citations
The Clinical Teacher
Medical Education and Admissions
0.54
article

Oral Presentations

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: The Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) is used internationally as a selection tool for medical school admissions. The MMI is a series of short, one-on-one interviews that assess such attributes as communication, problem-solving, and teamwork skills [1,2]. This study investigated the predictive validity of the MMI for the following outcome measures: medical school performance (Educational Performance Measure [EPM], Situational Judgement Test [SJT], Prescribing Safety Assessment [PSA]) and passing professional membership exams in medicine (RCGP, MRCP, MRCS). The study included data from two medical schools in the UK.<br/>Methods: Data from 4990 doctors who graduated from UK medical schools and sat the first part of professional membership exams in 2017-2019 was used. The UK Medical Education Database[3] provided linked data from different sources, including medical school admissions, assessments, and postgraduate training. Multinomial logistic regression analyses estimated the odds of passing college membership exam on first attempt.<br/>Results and Conclusion: MMI was a significant predictor of medical school performance, even after controlling for other factors such as high school grades (UCAS scores) and clinical aptitude test (UCAT scores). The MMI was also a significant predictor of passing college exams on first attempt, but the effect size was smaller than for those assessments that occur nearer to postgraduate training - EPM, SJT, and PSA scores. The findings suggest that the MMI is a valid predictor of educational success in both medical school and postgraduate training. Although the proportion of variance explained by MMI and all other predictors is small, MMI remains a valuable tool for medical school admissions. In the absence of innovations that can improve prediction, medical schools should continue using MMI in combination with other factors, such as UCAS and UCAT scores, to make admissions decisions.<br/>

The Clinical TeacherVol. 21(S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Medical Education and Admissions
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Oral Presentations · The Clinical Teacher (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS