Validation of the Psychometric Properties of the Conflict Resolution Styles Inventory in the University Population

This study aimed to validate the psychometric properties of the Conflict Resolution Styles Inventory (CRSI) within the context of the university population in Ecuador. The CRSI measures how individuals manage interpersonal conflicts, a critical skill for university students. A sample of 746 university students from various institutions across Ecuador participated in the study. The CRSI, which categorizes conflict resolution styles into five types (competing, avoiding, accommodating, collaborating, and compromising), was translated and culturally adapted for the Ecuadorian context. Psychometric analyses, including factor analysis and reliability testing, were conducted to assess the validity and reliability of the inventory. The factor analysis supported the five-factor structure of the CRSI, confirming that the inventory is suitable for measuring distinct conflict resolution styles in this population. The inventory showed good internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha values exceeding 0.70 for all subscales. Additionally, the test–retest reliability indicated stability over time. The validated CRSI provides a robust instrument for understanding and improving conflict resolution skills among university students in Ecuador, contributing to better interpersonal relationships and academic environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13110615
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Psychometric Properties of the Conflict Resolution Styles Inventory in the University Population

Venus Medina-Maldonado, Luis Burgos‐Benavides, Hugo Sinchi-Sinchi, Andrés Ramírez et al.
1 citations
Social Sciences
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
0.64
article

Validation of the Psychometric Properties of the Conflict Resolution Styles Inventory in the University Population

Venus Medina-Maldonado, Luis Burgos‐Benavides, Hugo Sinchi-Sinchi, Andrés Ramírez, Javier Herrero Díez, Francisco Javier Rodríguez‐Díaz, Alhena L. Alfaro-Urquiola
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to validate the psychometric properties of the Conflict Resolution Styles Inventory (CRSI) within the context of the university population in Ecuador. The CRSI measures how individuals manage interpersonal conflicts, a critical skill for university students. A sample of 746 university students from various institutions across Ecuador participated in the study. The CRSI, which categorizes conflict resolution styles into five types (competing, avoiding, accommodating, collaborating, and compromising), was translated and culturally adapted for the Ecuadorian context. Psychometric analyses, including factor analysis and reliability testing, were conducted to assess the validity and reliability of the inventory. The factor analysis supported the five-factor structure of the CRSI, confirming that the inventory is suitable for measuring distinct conflict resolution styles in this population. The inventory showed good internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha values exceeding 0.70 for all subscales. Additionally, the test–retest reliability indicated stability over time. The validated CRSI provides a robust instrument for understanding and improving conflict resolution skills among university students in Ecuador, contributing to better interpersonal relationships and academic environments.

Social SciencesVol. 13(11)
Universidad de Oviedo (ES), Politecnica Salesiana University (EC), Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador (EC), Universidad Católica Boliviana San Pablo (BO)
Universidad Politécnica Salesiana del Ecuador
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.