Comparative analysis of direct search methods for material design optimization

This paper contributes to the field of optimization for periodic composite material design by systematically evaluating the performance of four direct search algorithms: greedy, simulated annealing (SA), genetic algorithms (GA), and particle swarm optimization (PSO). The central goal is to determine the optimal arrangement of two material domains inside a representative volume element (RVE) while respecting the constraint that half volume of the domains is composed of a specific material, with the effective shear modulus as the objective function. The main contribution of this work is the detailed comparison of these algorithms in terms of success rates and computational efficiency, providing critical insights into their suitability for different problem scales. For a small-scale problem (16 cells), PSO achieves a 100% success rate, while SA demonstrates over 90% success but at a higher computational cost. The greedy algorithm, despite its simplicity, achieves a 72% success rate with the lowest computational effort, requiring an average of 256 objective function evaluations. GA, however, exhibits the lowest success rate at 52% and requires the highest average number of evaluations (5003.2). Furthermore, the paper extends the analysis to a more complex problem (36 cells), where the adaptability and efficiency of the algorithms are tested. This investigation highlights the trade-offs between algorithmic complexity, success rate, and computational cost, offering practical guidelines for selecting suitable optimization methods based on problem size and characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part L Journal of Materials Design and Applications
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207241294056
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Theoretical and Applied Studies in Material Sciences and Geometry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of direct search methods for material design optimization

A. Vasile, Iulian Constantin Coropeţchi, Dragoş Alexandru Apostol, Dan Mihai Constantinescu et al.
2 citations
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part L Journal of Materials Design and Applications
Advanced Theoretical and Applied Studies in Material Sciences and Geometry
0.37
article

Comparative analysis of direct search methods for material design optimization

A. Vasile, Iulian Constantin Coropeţchi, Dragoş Alexandru Apostol, Dan Mihai Constantinescu, Ștefan Sorohan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper contributes to the field of optimization for periodic composite material design by systematically evaluating the performance of four direct search algorithms: greedy, simulated annealing (SA), genetic algorithms (GA), and particle swarm optimization (PSO). The central goal is to determine the optimal arrangement of two material domains inside a representative volume element (RVE) while respecting the constraint that half volume of the domains is composed of a specific material, with the effective shear modulus as the objective function. The main contribution of this work is the detailed comparison of these algorithms in terms of success rates and computational efficiency, providing critical insights into their suitability for different problem scales. For a small-scale problem (16 cells), PSO achieves a 100% success rate, while SA demonstrates over 90% success but at a higher computational cost. The greedy algorithm, despite its simplicity, achieves a 72% success rate with the lowest computational effort, requiring an average of 256 objective function evaluations. GA, however, exhibits the lowest success rate at 52% and requires the highest average number of evaluations (5003.2). Furthermore, the paper extends the analysis to a more complex problem (36 cells), where the adaptability and efficiency of the algorithms are tested. This investigation highlights the trade-offs between algorithmic complexity, success rate, and computational cost, offering practical guidelines for selecting suitable optimization methods based on problem size and characteristics.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part L Journal of Materials Design and ApplicationsVol. 239(4)
Military Technical Academy (RO), Academia Oamenilor de Știință din România (RO), Universitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Advanced Theoretical and Applied Studies in Material Sciences and Geometry
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.