An Overview of the Mechanical Behavior of Nanocomposites Considering the Interphase

ABSTRACT Over the past decade, nanocomposites with polymer matrices have garnered significant attention for their ability to enhance properties with minimal inclusion volume, thanks to nanoscale reinforcement. The key factor distinguishing them from microcomposites is the interphase, an area of interaction where matrix properties are influenced by the reinforcement. This induces a dependence on particle size that sets nanocomposites apart. Observation of the interphase is achieved through experimental methods like atomic force microscopy (AFM) and numerical approaches such as molecular dynamics (MD) modeling. Indirect determination involves the comparison of experimental results with predictive models, which may be numerical or analytical homogenization schemes. The widely used double inclusion scheme focuses on nanocomposites, but for a comprehensive mechanical behavior prediction, elastic behavior alone is not sufficient. Factors in the matrix (plasticity, viscosity, temperature) and morphology (dispersion, surface treatment, bonding) must be considered. This review explores various methods in the literature that address these aspects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymers for Advanced Technologies
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.6620
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Composite Material Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Overview of the Mechanical Behavior of Nanocomposites Considering the Interphase

Abdelkibir Benelfellah, Nourredine Aït Hocine, Nicolas Raoux
7 citations
Polymers for Advanced Technologies
Composite Material Mechanics
1.88
article

An Overview of the Mechanical Behavior of Nanocomposites Considering the Interphase

Abdelkibir Benelfellah, Nourredine Aït Hocine, Nicolas Raoux
article en
7 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Over the past decade, nanocomposites with polymer matrices have garnered significant attention for their ability to enhance properties with minimal inclusion volume, thanks to nanoscale reinforcement. The key factor distinguishing them from microcomposites is the interphase, an area of interaction where matrix properties are influenced by the reinforcement. This induces a dependence on particle size that sets nanocomposites apart. Observation of the interphase is achieved through experimental methods like atomic force microscopy (AFM) and numerical approaches such as molecular dynamics (MD) modeling. Indirect determination involves the comparison of experimental results with predictive models, which may be numerical or analytical homogenization schemes. The widely used double inclusion scheme focuses on nanocomposites, but for a comprehensive mechanical behavior prediction, elastic behavior alone is not sufficient. Factors in the matrix (plasticity, viscosity, temperature) and morphology (dispersion, surface treatment, bonding) must be considered. This review explores various methods in the literature that address these aspects.

Polymers for Advanced TechnologiesVol. 35(11)
Université de Tours (FR), Université d'Orléans (FR), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées Centre Val de Loire (FR), Institut Polytechnique des Sciences Avancées (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Composite Material Mechanics
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.