Production of Xylitol and Ethanol from Agricultural Wastes and Biotransformation of Phenylacetylcarbinol in Deep Eutectic Solvent
Converting agricultural biomass wastes into bio-chemicals can significantly decrease greenhouse gas emissions and foster global initiatives towards mitigating climate change. This study examined the co-production of xylitol and ethanol from xylose and glucose-rich hydrolysates of corn cob (CC), sugarcane bagasse (SCB), and rice straw (RS) without prior detoxification, using C. magnoliae (C. mag), C. tropicalis (C. trop), and C. guilliermondii (C. guil). A score ranking system based on weighted yields and productivity assessed the best raw material and yeast strain combination. The study revealed that C. mag cultivated on RS hemicellulosic and CC cellulosic media exhibited statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) superiority in xylitol (272 ± 5) and ethanol 273 ± 3, production. The single-phase emulsion system using frozen-thawed whole cells of CC—C. mag, CC—C. trop, and RS—C. guil was utilized for phenylacetylcarbinol (PAC) biotransformation. Although similar PAC concentration within 14.4–14.7 mM was obtained, the statistically significant higher (p ≤ 0.05) volumetric pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC) activity from C. mag at 360 min was observed by 28.3 ± 1.51%. Consequently, further utilization of CC—C. mag in a two-phase emulsion system (Pi buffer: vegetable oil (Vg. oil) and Pi buffer: deep eutectic solvents (DES)) revealed that Pi buffer: DES medium preserved volumetric PDC activity (54.0 ± 1.2%) statistically significant higher (p ≤ 0.05) than the Pi buffer: Vg. oil system (34.3 ± 1.3%), with no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) in [PAC]. These findings outlined the sustainable pioneering approach for the co-production of chemicals and reusing the residual yeast cells for PAC biotransformation in the Pi buffer: DES system.
Authors
- Pornchai Rachtanapun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8157-4433)
- Kritsadaporn Porninta
- Chatchadaporn Mahakuntha (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0058-5382)
- Suphat Phongthai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6717-3497)
- Noppol Leksawasdi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4699-1351)
- Julaluk Khemacheewakul (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7942-1665)
- Siraphat Taesuwan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0140-4942)
- Xinshu Zhuang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7496-2208)
- Sumeth Sommanee
- Yuthana Phimolsiripol (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3521-1599)
- Anbarasu Kumar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8910-6391)
- Kittisak Jantanasakulwong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9070-9579)
- Charin Techapun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3632-6470)
- Worasit Tochampa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0031-9703)
- Rojarej Nunta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0935-9357)
- Su Lwin Htike
- Wen Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4120-0773)
- Juan Feng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3356-8707)
- Wei Qi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3000-6951)
Institutions
- Periyar Maniammai Institute of Science & Technology (IN)
- Lampang Rajabhat University (TH)
- Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion (CN)
- Chiang Mai University (TH)
- Naresuan University (TH)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Agriculture
- Published
- 2024-11-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14112043
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.55
Funders
- Thailand Institute of Scientific and Technological Research
- Chiang Mai University
- Thailand Research Fund
- Thailand Science Research and Innovation