Measuring Raven’s Progressive Matrices Combining Eye-Tracking Technology and Machine Learning (ML) Models

Extended testing time in Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM) can lead to increased fatigue and reduced motivation, which may impair cognitive task performance. This study explores the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in RPM by combining eye-tracking technology with machine learning (ML) models, aiming to explore new methods for improving the efficiency of RPM testing and to identify the key metrics involved. Using eye-tracking metrics as features, ten ML models were trained, with the XGBoost model demonstrating superior performance. Notably, we further refined the period of interest and reduced the number of metrics, achieving strong performance, with accuracy, precision, and recall all above 0.8, using only 60% of the response time and nine eye-tracking metrics. This study also examines the role of several key metrics in RPM and offers valuable insights for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intelligence
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12110116
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Raven’s Progressive Matrices Combining Eye-Tracking Technology and Machine Learning (ML) Models

Ning Jia, Shumeng Ma
5 citations
Journal of Intelligence
Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
1.17
article

Measuring Raven’s Progressive Matrices Combining Eye-Tracking Technology and Machine Learning (ML) Models

Ning Jia, Shumeng Ma
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Extended testing time in Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM) can lead to increased fatigue and reduced motivation, which may impair cognitive task performance. This study explores the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in RPM by combining eye-tracking technology with machine learning (ML) models, aiming to explore new methods for improving the efficiency of RPM testing and to identify the key metrics involved. Using eye-tracking metrics as features, ten ML models were trained, with the XGBoost model demonstrating superior performance. Notably, we further refined the period of interest and reduced the number of metrics, achieving strong performance, with accuracy, precision, and recall all above 0.8, using only 60% of the response time and nine eye-tracking metrics. This study also examines the role of several key metrics in RPM and offers valuable insights for future research.

Journal of IntelligenceVol. 12(11)
Hebei Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
1.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.