Abstract 4112589: Typology of Self-Care in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes and Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia

Introduction: Individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) complicated by impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH) are at significantly increased risk for severe hypoglycemia: a marker of high risk of CVD. Tailoring interventions to promote hypoglycemia avoidance is difficult due to self-care heterogeneity among those with T1D. Aims: Map self-care heterogeneity among adults with T1D into behavioral phenotypes and identify common barriers to hypoglycemia avoidance within each phenotype. Methods: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study was performed in 200 adults with T1D. Participants reported personal, clinical, and social determinants of health, hypoglycemia awareness, and self-care of diabetes (Self-Care of Diabetes Inventory, scored 0-100, adequate ≥70) . Cluster analysis was performed to identify self-care clusters. Then, directed content analysis was applied to individual, semi-structured interviews performed in a subsample from each cluster with IAH ( n =20). Findings were integrated to develop a typology of self-care and identify barriers to hypoglycemia avoidance within each phenotype. Results: Three self-care phenotypes were identified. Experts ( n =70; mean age: 45±17 years; 24% Black; T1D duration: 25±16 years; HbA 1c : 7.36±1.67%; IAH: 20%) performed all aspects of self-care adequately (Maintenance: 84.9±8.8; Monitoring: 85.1±8.8; Management: 72.5±10). Yet, Experts with IAH reported purposefully delaying treatment of hypoglycemia due to lack of concern. Those with Inconsistent self-care ( n = 112; mean age 37±14 years; 20% Black: T1D duration: 21±13 years; HbA 1c : 7.26±1.16%; IAH: 30%) performed only self-care maintenance adequately (Maintenance: 78.6±8.9; Monitoring: 65.6±9.8; Management: 56.8±10.1). Those with Inconsistent self-care and IAH reported passive self-care monitoring that inhibited effective hypoglycemic management. Novices ( n = 18; mean age 27±7 years; 50% Black: T1D duration: 16±8 years; HbA 1c : 8.97±2.80%; IAH: 28%) reported difficulty performing all aspects of self-care (Maintenance: 51.9±7.7, Monitoring: 56.9±12.9, Management: 44.5±6.3) due to economic and psychosocial barriers. Conclusions: Self-care heterogeneity mapped onto three phenotypes that can be used to better understand patient barriers to hypoglycemia avoidance and hypoglycemia awareness restoration. This typology provides a framework for investigating how best to tailor IAH treatment considerate of self-care.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4112589
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4112589: Typology of Self-Care in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes and Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia

Peter F. Cronholm, Austin Matus, Michael Roehrhoff Rickels, Barbara J. Riegel et al.
Circulation
Diabetes Management and Research
article

Abstract 4112589: Typology of Self-Care in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes and Impaired Awareness of Hypoglycemia

Peter F. Cronholm, Austin Matus, Michael Roehrhoff Rickels, Barbara J. Riegel, Lea Ann Matura
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) complicated by impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH) are at significantly increased risk for severe hypoglycemia: a marker of high risk of CVD. Tailoring interventions to promote hypoglycemia avoidance is difficult due to self-care heterogeneity among those with T1D. Aims: Map self-care heterogeneity among adults with T1D into behavioral phenotypes and identify common barriers to hypoglycemia avoidance within each phenotype. Methods: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study was performed in 200 adults with T1D. Participants reported personal, clinical, and social determinants of health, hypoglycemia awareness, and self-care of diabetes (Self-Care of Diabetes Inventory, scored 0-100, adequate ≥70) . Cluster analysis was performed to identify self-care clusters. Then, directed content analysis was applied to individual, semi-structured interviews performed in a subsample from each cluster with IAH ( n =20). Findings were integrated to develop a typology of self-care and identify barriers to hypoglycemia avoidance within each phenotype. Results: Three self-care phenotypes were identified. Experts ( n =70; mean age: 45±17 years; 24% Black; T1D duration: 25±16 years; HbA 1c : 7.36±1.67%; IAH: 20%) performed all aspects of self-care adequately (Maintenance: 84.9±8.8; Monitoring: 85.1±8.8; Management: 72.5±10). Yet, Experts with IAH reported purposefully delaying treatment of hypoglycemia due to lack of concern. Those with Inconsistent self-care ( n = 112; mean age 37±14 years; 20% Black: T1D duration: 21±13 years; HbA 1c : 7.26±1.16%; IAH: 30%) performed only self-care maintenance adequately (Maintenance: 78.6±8.9; Monitoring: 65.6±9.8; Management: 56.8±10.1). Those with Inconsistent self-care and IAH reported passive self-care monitoring that inhibited effective hypoglycemic management. Novices ( n = 18; mean age 27±7 years; 50% Black: T1D duration: 16±8 years; HbA 1c : 8.97±2.80%; IAH: 28%) reported difficulty performing all aspects of self-care (Maintenance: 51.9±7.7, Monitoring: 56.9±12.9, Management: 44.5±6.3) due to economic and psychosocial barriers. Conclusions: Self-care heterogeneity mapped onto three phenotypes that can be used to better understand patient barriers to hypoglycemia avoidance and hypoglycemia awareness restoration. This typology provides a framework for investigating how best to tailor IAH treatment considerate of self-care.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Diabetes Management and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.