Abstract 4123480: Navigating Aspirin Allergy With Rapid Desensitization In A Patient Requiring Urgent Coronary Intervention

Introduction: Aspirin (ASA) hypersensitivity is a challenge in determining the appropriate, cost-effective therapy in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Various ASA desensitization protocols were studied and showed favorable outcomes. In this case, we highlight the use of rapid ASA desensitization protocols for patients requiring dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) post urgent PCI. Case: A 52-year-old male presented with severe left-sided chest pain associated with diaphoresis. He had a history of allergic reaction to ASA at the age of 18 years with swelling of the face and throat without shortness of breath or hypotension. Physical examination was unremarkable except for tachycardia. Workup showed no ECG abnormalities but significantly elevated, uptrending high sensitivity troponin. Medical management included clopidogrel load, heparin drip, and nitropaste for persistent pain. Urgent coronary angiography showed a severe bifurcating lesion in the LCx and OM1 arteries, successfully treated with the T stent technique using a drug-eluting stent. He received cilostazol and prasugrel, overlapped with a tirofiban drip post PCI. ASA desensitization was performed with oral ASA every 90 minutes for four doses (Figure). Vital signs were monitored every 30, 60, and 90 minutes after each dose. He was discharged home with no reported symptoms on follow up. Discussion: DAPT with ASA and oral P2Y12 inhibitors is recommended for patients with PCI. ASA desensitization could be considered for patients who are intolerant to ASA. Major clinical ASA desensitization protocols, like in ADAPTED and SCRIPPS studies, showed good outcomes in major adverse cardiovascular events. However, one limitation of these widely used protocols is the prolonged time required to achieve desensitization. The rapid protocol used in our patient who did not have ASA exacerbated respiratory disease showed effectiveness with shorter hospital stay. Conclusion: ASA desensitization is an appropriate option for patients with a history of ASA allergy requiring DAPT. Rapid desensitization protocols are associated with shorter hospitalization courses, and future efforts should evaluate their effectiveness in randomized controlled trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4123480
Primary Topic
Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4123480: Navigating Aspirin Allergy With Rapid Desensitization In A Patient Requiring Urgent Coronary Intervention

Matthew Derakhshesh, Mohamad Ghazal, Radmila Lyubarova, Omar Daghstani
Circulation
Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
article

Abstract 4123480: Navigating Aspirin Allergy With Rapid Desensitization In A Patient Requiring Urgent Coronary Intervention

Matthew Derakhshesh, Mohamad Ghazal, Radmila Lyubarova, Omar Daghstani
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Aspirin (ASA) hypersensitivity is a challenge in determining the appropriate, cost-effective therapy in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Various ASA desensitization protocols were studied and showed favorable outcomes. In this case, we highlight the use of rapid ASA desensitization protocols for patients requiring dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) post urgent PCI. Case: A 52-year-old male presented with severe left-sided chest pain associated with diaphoresis. He had a history of allergic reaction to ASA at the age of 18 years with swelling of the face and throat without shortness of breath or hypotension. Physical examination was unremarkable except for tachycardia. Workup showed no ECG abnormalities but significantly elevated, uptrending high sensitivity troponin. Medical management included clopidogrel load, heparin drip, and nitropaste for persistent pain. Urgent coronary angiography showed a severe bifurcating lesion in the LCx and OM1 arteries, successfully treated with the T stent technique using a drug-eluting stent. He received cilostazol and prasugrel, overlapped with a tirofiban drip post PCI. ASA desensitization was performed with oral ASA every 90 minutes for four doses (Figure). Vital signs were monitored every 30, 60, and 90 minutes after each dose. He was discharged home with no reported symptoms on follow up. Discussion: DAPT with ASA and oral P2Y12 inhibitors is recommended for patients with PCI. ASA desensitization could be considered for patients who are intolerant to ASA. Major clinical ASA desensitization protocols, like in ADAPTED and SCRIPPS studies, showed good outcomes in major adverse cardiovascular events. However, one limitation of these widely used protocols is the prolonged time required to achieve desensitization. The rapid protocol used in our patient who did not have ASA exacerbated respiratory disease showed effectiveness with shorter hospital stay. Conclusion: ASA desensitization is an appropriate option for patients with a history of ASA allergy requiring DAPT. Rapid desensitization protocols are associated with shorter hospitalization courses, and future efforts should evaluate their effectiveness in randomized controlled trials.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Albany Medical Center Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.