Biogas Production from a Solar-Heated Temperature-Controlled Biogas Digester

This research paper explores biogas production in an underground temperature-controlled fixed dome digester and compares it with a similar uncontrolled digester. Two underground fixed-dome digesters, one fitted with a solar heating system and a stirrer and the other one with an identical stirrer only, were batch-fed with cow dung slurry collected from the University of Fort Hare farm and mixed with water in a ratio of 1:1. The solar heating system consisted of a solar geyser, pex-al-pex tubing, an electric ball valve, a water circulation pump, an Arduino aided temperature control system, and a heat exchanger located at the centre of the digester. Both the digesters were intermittently stirred for 10 min every 4 h. The digester without a heating system was used as a control. Biogas production in the two digesters was compared to assess the effect of solar heating on biogas production. The total solids, volatile solids, and the chemical oxygen demand of the cow dung used as substrate were determined before and after digestion. These were compared together with the cumulative biogas produced and the methane content for the controlled and uncontrolled digesters. It was observed that the temperature control system kept the slurry temperature in the controlled digester within the required range for 82.76% of the retention period, showing an efficiency of 82.76%. Some maximum temperature gradients of 7.0 °C were observed in both the controlled and uncontrolled digesters, showing that the stirrer speed of 30 rpm was not fast enough to create the needed vortex for a uniform mix in the slurry. It was further observed that the heat from the solar geyser and the ground insulation were sufficient to keep the digester temperature within the required temperature range without any additional heat source even at night. Biogas yield was observed to depend on the pH with a strong coefficient of determination of 0.788 and 0.755 for the controlled and uncontrolled digesters, respectively. The cumulative biogas was 26.77 m3 and 18.05 m3 for controlled and uncontrolled digesters, respectively, which was an increase of 33%. The methane content increased by 14% while carbon dioxide decreased by 10% from the uncontrolled to the controlled scenario. The percentage removal of the TS, VS, and COD was 66.26%, 76.81%, and 74.69%, respectively, compared to 47.01%, 60.37%, and 57.86% for the uncontrolled situation. Thus, the percentage removal of TS, VS, and COD increased by 19.25%, 16.44%, and 16.89%, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229894
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biogas Production from a Solar-Heated Temperature-Controlled Biogas Digester

Francis Makamure, Golden Makaka, Patrick Mukumba
10 citations
Sustainability
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
2.65
article

Biogas Production from a Solar-Heated Temperature-Controlled Biogas Digester

Francis Makamure, Golden Makaka, Patrick Mukumba
article en
10 citations

Abstract

This research paper explores biogas production in an underground temperature-controlled fixed dome digester and compares it with a similar uncontrolled digester. Two underground fixed-dome digesters, one fitted with a solar heating system and a stirrer and the other one with an identical stirrer only, were batch-fed with cow dung slurry collected from the University of Fort Hare farm and mixed with water in a ratio of 1:1. The solar heating system consisted of a solar geyser, pex-al-pex tubing, an electric ball valve, a water circulation pump, an Arduino aided temperature control system, and a heat exchanger located at the centre of the digester. Both the digesters were intermittently stirred for 10 min every 4 h. The digester without a heating system was used as a control. Biogas production in the two digesters was compared to assess the effect of solar heating on biogas production. The total solids, volatile solids, and the chemical oxygen demand of the cow dung used as substrate were determined before and after digestion. These were compared together with the cumulative biogas produced and the methane content for the controlled and uncontrolled digesters. It was observed that the temperature control system kept the slurry temperature in the controlled digester within the required range for 82.76% of the retention period, showing an efficiency of 82.76%. Some maximum temperature gradients of 7.0 °C were observed in both the controlled and uncontrolled digesters, showing that the stirrer speed of 30 rpm was not fast enough to create the needed vortex for a uniform mix in the slurry. It was further observed that the heat from the solar geyser and the ground insulation were sufficient to keep the digester temperature within the required temperature range without any additional heat source even at night. Biogas yield was observed to depend on the pH with a strong coefficient of determination of 0.788 and 0.755 for the controlled and uncontrolled digesters, respectively. The cumulative biogas was 26.77 m3 and 18.05 m3 for controlled and uncontrolled digesters, respectively, which was an increase of 33%. The methane content increased by 14% while carbon dioxide decreased by 10% from the uncontrolled to the controlled scenario. The percentage removal of the TS, VS, and COD was 66.26%, 76.81%, and 74.69%, respectively, compared to 47.01%, 60.37%, and 57.86% for the uncontrolled situation. Thus, the percentage removal of TS, VS, and COD increased by 19.25%, 16.44%, and 16.89%, respectively.

SustainabilityVol. 16(22)
University of Fort Hare (ZA)
National Research Foundation, University of Fort Hare
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
2.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.