Abstract 4115139: The Clinic Ottakring – Lipid Registry: a Contemporary Single-Center Real-World Analysis from a Tertiary Hospital

In the real world only about 20 % of patients with ASCVD are at the target range, as shown by the SANTORINI trial (1). Therefore, there is still a great need for the improvement of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). Our Lipid Registry was set up as a retrospective study including patients who visited our outpatients ward focusing on lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). The indications were: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) > 130 mg/dL in LLT- naive patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), coronary artery disease (CAD) not on optimal LLT, familial hypercholesterolemia and LLT intolerance. We collected baseline characteristics as well as laboratory parameters of these patients during their visits. The dual LLT (high-potency statin and ezetimibe) was initiated in every patient during the hospitalization, if not contraindicated, as target variable we used non-HDL-C. In total 181 patients were included, of which 136 (75.1%) patients visited our clinic for control purposes. Patients who didn’t visit the clinic were predominantly men and had no or few pre-experiences with LLT. Fourty-one (36.9%) patients had a BMI>30, 126 (92.6%) of patients had CAD of which 85 (63%) had the diagnosis of a recent ACS. Arterial hypertension was present in 78.7% and diabetes mellitus type 2 in 23.5% of cases. At the 1 st visit to our LLT department 4-6 weeks after dismission from the hospital, 86 patients (61.9%) reached the recommended (ESC/EAS 2019) non-HDL-C goal. At the 2 nd visit (8-12 weeks after index hospitalization), 117 patients (86.2%) and at the 3 rd visit 120 patients (88.2%) reached their target. The analysis of patients initially presenting with ACS showed that 60 (69.8%) of them after 4-6 weeks and 77 (90.6%) patients after 8-12 weeks reached the recommended non-HDL-c goal. Among the study population 108 (79.4%) of patients, and 81 (95.3%) of ACS patients received dual LLT immediately during the index event. After the first visit, 31 (36.5%) of ACS patients needed the addition of the third lipid-lowering drug to achieve the recommended goal (see attached tables). Our strategy for managing hyperlipidemia in patients with a very-high cardiovascular risk showed high achievement of the non-HDL-C goal as recommended by the recent ESC guidelines in contrast to real-world data. We were able to demonstrate, that the strategy based on the idea to treat high-CV risk patients early and strong is the way to reach the treatment goal in a high percentage of patients (2).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4115139
Primary Topic
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4115139: The Clinic Ottakring – Lipid Registry: a Contemporary Single-Center Real-World Analysis from a Tertiary Hospital

Achim Leo Burger, Georg Neubauer, Edita Pogran, Kurt Huber et al.
1 links
Circulation
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
article

Abstract 4115139: The Clinic Ottakring – Lipid Registry: a Contemporary Single-Center Real-World Analysis from a Tertiary Hospital

Achim Leo Burger, Georg Neubauer, Edita Pogran, Kurt Huber, Paul F Harbich, Patrick Weltler
article en

Abstract

In the real world only about 20 % of patients with ASCVD are at the target range, as shown by the SANTORINI trial (1). Therefore, there is still a great need for the improvement of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). Our Lipid Registry was set up as a retrospective study including patients who visited our outpatients ward focusing on lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). The indications were: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) > 130 mg/dL in LLT- naive patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), coronary artery disease (CAD) not on optimal LLT, familial hypercholesterolemia and LLT intolerance. We collected baseline characteristics as well as laboratory parameters of these patients during their visits. The dual LLT (high-potency statin and ezetimibe) was initiated in every patient during the hospitalization, if not contraindicated, as target variable we used non-HDL-C. In total 181 patients were included, of which 136 (75.1%) patients visited our clinic for control purposes. Patients who didn’t visit the clinic were predominantly men and had no or few pre-experiences with LLT. Fourty-one (36.9%) patients had a BMI>30, 126 (92.6%) of patients had CAD of which 85 (63%) had the diagnosis of a recent ACS. Arterial hypertension was present in 78.7% and diabetes mellitus type 2 in 23.5% of cases. At the 1 st visit to our LLT department 4-6 weeks after dismission from the hospital, 86 patients (61.9%) reached the recommended (ESC/EAS 2019) non-HDL-C goal. At the 2 nd visit (8-12 weeks after index hospitalization), 117 patients (86.2%) and at the 3 rd visit 120 patients (88.2%) reached their target. The analysis of patients initially presenting with ACS showed that 60 (69.8%) of them after 4-6 weeks and 77 (90.6%) patients after 8-12 weeks reached the recommended non-HDL-c goal. Among the study population 108 (79.4%) of patients, and 81 (95.3%) of ACS patients received dual LLT immediately during the index event. After the first visit, 31 (36.5%) of ACS patients needed the addition of the third lipid-lowering drug to achieve the recommended goal (see attached tables). Our strategy for managing hyperlipidemia in patients with a very-high cardiovascular risk showed high achievement of the non-HDL-C goal as recommended by the recent ESC guidelines in contrast to real-world data. We were able to demonstrate, that the strategy based on the idea to treat high-CV risk patients early and strong is the way to reach the treatment goal in a high percentage of patients (2).

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Sigmund Freud Privatuniversität Wien (AT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.