Abstract 4118183: Anxiety disorder, depression and coronary artery disease: associations and modification by genetic susceptibility

Background: Associations of anxiety disorder and depression with coronary artery disease (CAD) are heterogeneous between populations. Research questions: How does genetic susceptibility to CAD alter the associations between anxiety and depression and incident CAD? Aims: To investigate how genetic susceptibility to CAD alters the associations of anxiety and depression with incident CAD, comparing and combining anxiety and depression. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study using UK Biobank. Diagnoses of anxiety disorder and depression before the baseline assessment were ascertained through linked hospital admission data. Incident CAD was ascertained through hospital admission and death certificate data after baseline. CAD polygenic risk score (PRS) was obtained from CARDIoGRAMplus4 and categorised into low, intermediate, and high. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine associations between anxiety and depression and CAD. The product term of PRS and these mental health conditions, and the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI), were used to investigate the presence of multiplicative and additive interactions, respectively. Results: Our study included 288,152 participants of whom 54.4% were female, with a mean age of 56.4 years. Both anxiety disorder (HR: 2.24, 95% CI: 1.86–2.70) and depression (HR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.80–2.32) were associated with CAD after adjusting for sociodemographic confounders. There was an addictive interaction between depression and PRS (RERI: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.06–1.65) such that the association between depression and CAD was strongest among those with a high PRS whilst there was no such evidence for anxiety disorder. Anxiety only (HR 1.69, 95% 1.17–2.45), depression only (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.62–2.49) and concomitant anxiety and depression (HR 3.51, 95% CI 2.26–5.45) were associated with CAD even among people with a low PRS. Lifestyle mediators attenuated all these associations across PRS categories. Conclusions: CAD genetic susceptibility might partly contribute to the clustering of depression and CAD but does not provide a full explanation, nor does it explain the association between anxiety disorder and CAD. Therefore, other mechanisms should be explored.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4118183
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4118183: Anxiety disorder, depression and coronary artery disease: associations and modification by genetic susceptibility

Shinya Nakada
Circulation
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
article

Abstract 4118183: Anxiety disorder, depression and coronary artery disease: associations and modification by genetic susceptibility

Shinya Nakada
article en

Abstract

Background: Associations of anxiety disorder and depression with coronary artery disease (CAD) are heterogeneous between populations. Research questions: How does genetic susceptibility to CAD alter the associations between anxiety and depression and incident CAD? Aims: To investigate how genetic susceptibility to CAD alters the associations of anxiety and depression with incident CAD, comparing and combining anxiety and depression. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study using UK Biobank. Diagnoses of anxiety disorder and depression before the baseline assessment were ascertained through linked hospital admission data. Incident CAD was ascertained through hospital admission and death certificate data after baseline. CAD polygenic risk score (PRS) was obtained from CARDIoGRAMplus4 and categorised into low, intermediate, and high. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine associations between anxiety and depression and CAD. The product term of PRS and these mental health conditions, and the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI), were used to investigate the presence of multiplicative and additive interactions, respectively. Results: Our study included 288,152 participants of whom 54.4% were female, with a mean age of 56.4 years. Both anxiety disorder (HR: 2.24, 95% CI: 1.86–2.70) and depression (HR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.80–2.32) were associated with CAD after adjusting for sociodemographic confounders. There was an addictive interaction between depression and PRS (RERI: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.06–1.65) such that the association between depression and CAD was strongest among those with a high PRS whilst there was no such evidence for anxiety disorder. Anxiety only (HR 1.69, 95% 1.17–2.45), depression only (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.62–2.49) and concomitant anxiety and depression (HR 3.51, 95% CI 2.26–5.45) were associated with CAD even among people with a low PRS. Lifestyle mediators attenuated all these associations across PRS categories. Conclusions: CAD genetic susceptibility might partly contribute to the clustering of depression and CAD but does not provide a full explanation, nor does it explain the association between anxiety disorder and CAD. Therefore, other mechanisms should be explored.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of Glasgow (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.