Abstract 4120196: Temporal Trends and Predictors of Cardiac Biomarker Testing in the Emergency Department, 2014-2021

Background: Presenting symptoms risk stratify patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) to determine their likelihood of having a myocardial infarction (MI) and need for cardiac biomarker testing. Since the 2014 AHA/ACC non-ST segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) guideline, little is known regarding cardiac biomarker testing trends in the United States. Methods: We analyzed data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for consecutive adult ED visits between 2014 and 2021 in the United States. The primary outcome was the proportion of ED visits where cardiac biomarker testing occurred. Subgroup analysis was performed for visits with chest pain, non-chest pain anginal equivalents, and non-anginal symptoms. Survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression was used to generate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) to assess predictors of cardiac biomarker utilization. Results: In total, 87,965 ED visits were sampled, representing a weighted total of 644,531,395 visits. Cardiac biomarker testing occurred in 7.21% of all ED visits (95% CI, 6.27%-8.29%) and increased over time (Figure, P =0.03 for trend). When stratified by symptoms, utilization of testing mainly increased among patients with non-chest pain anginal equivalents (Figure, P =0.02 for trend). Cardiac biomarker testing was most frequently used for patients with chest pain (34.9%) and non-chest pain anginal equivalents (39.3%). Nonetheless, 25.8% of patients who underwent testing had no chest pain or anginal equivalents. Cardiac biomarker testing was more frequent among patients with older age (aOR 1.03 per year, 95% CI 1.03-1.04), tachycardia (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.13-1.41), tachypnea (aOR 1.71, 95% CI 1.47-1.98), history of heart failure (aOR 1.33, 95% CI 1.15-1.54), prior venous thromboembolism (aOR 1.43, 95% CI 1.12-1.83), and those treated in a rural setting (aOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.14-2.32). Conclusion: Cardiac biomarker testing in the ED has increased over time, mostly attributed to increased utilization among patients with a low pre-test probability of MI. Notably, 25% of individuals who underwent cardiac biomarker testing had no chest pain or anginal-equivalent symptoms. More judicious utilization of cardiac biomarker testing may be needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4120196
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4120196: Temporal Trends and Predictors of Cardiac Biomarker Testing in the Emergency Department, 2014-2021

Nathan Watson, James Louis Januzzi, Eric A. Secemsky, Cian P. McCarthy et al.
Circulation
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Abstract 4120196: Temporal Trends and Predictors of Cardiac Biomarker Testing in the Emergency Department, 2014-2021

Nathan Watson, James Louis Januzzi, Eric A. Secemsky, Cian P. McCarthy, Jason H. Wasfy, Christopher W. Baugh
article en

Abstract

Background: Presenting symptoms risk stratify patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) to determine their likelihood of having a myocardial infarction (MI) and need for cardiac biomarker testing. Since the 2014 AHA/ACC non-ST segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) guideline, little is known regarding cardiac biomarker testing trends in the United States. Methods: We analyzed data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for consecutive adult ED visits between 2014 and 2021 in the United States. The primary outcome was the proportion of ED visits where cardiac biomarker testing occurred. Subgroup analysis was performed for visits with chest pain, non-chest pain anginal equivalents, and non-anginal symptoms. Survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression was used to generate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) to assess predictors of cardiac biomarker utilization. Results: In total, 87,965 ED visits were sampled, representing a weighted total of 644,531,395 visits. Cardiac biomarker testing occurred in 7.21% of all ED visits (95% CI, 6.27%-8.29%) and increased over time (Figure, P =0.03 for trend). When stratified by symptoms, utilization of testing mainly increased among patients with non-chest pain anginal equivalents (Figure, P =0.02 for trend). Cardiac biomarker testing was most frequently used for patients with chest pain (34.9%) and non-chest pain anginal equivalents (39.3%). Nonetheless, 25.8% of patients who underwent testing had no chest pain or anginal equivalents. Cardiac biomarker testing was more frequent among patients with older age (aOR 1.03 per year, 95% CI 1.03-1.04), tachycardia (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.13-1.41), tachypnea (aOR 1.71, 95% CI 1.47-1.98), history of heart failure (aOR 1.33, 95% CI 1.15-1.54), prior venous thromboembolism (aOR 1.43, 95% CI 1.12-1.83), and those treated in a rural setting (aOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.14-2.32). Conclusion: Cardiac biomarker testing in the ED has increased over time, mostly attributed to increased utilization among patients with a low pre-test probability of MI. Notably, 25% of individuals who underwent cardiac biomarker testing had no chest pain or anginal-equivalent symptoms. More judicious utilization of cardiac biomarker testing may be needed.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.