Abstract 4114417: Polygenic Risk in Heart Failure – Evaluating the Ability of a Polygenic Risk Score to Identify Risk of Future Heart Failure Events in 60,000 Patients from 6 TIMI Randomized Trials

Background: The ability of polygenic risk scores (PRS) to predict heart failure (HF) beyond classic risk factors is unclear. Aims: To evaluate the risk of a HF PRS with incident hospitalization for HF (HHF) in patients with established cardiovascular disease. Methods: We analyzed a 59 SNP HF PRS (HERMES collaboration, Henry et al) in genotyped patients from six multinational TIMI randomized controlled trials (DECLARE, ENGAGE AF, FOURIER, PEGASUS, SAVOR, SOLID). Patients were stratified to low (quintile, Q1), intermediate (Q2-Q4), or high (Q5) genetic risk. We investigated the association of the HF PRS with incident HHF (median of 2.5 years) i) stratified by prior HF, and ii) across NTproBNP concentrations at baseline, using Cox-proportional hazard models. Results are reported as HR [95% CI], per 1-SD or with Q1 as a reference, and adjusted for ancestry (principal components 1-5), age, sex, trial, BMI, smoking, systolic BP, prior CAD, DM, AF, and eGFR. Results: In 59,906 pts (median age 66 years; 71% male; 26% prior HF), the HF PRS was associated with incident HHF (HR adj per 1-SD 1.08 [1.03, 1.13], p<0.001). Compared to low genetic risk pts, the HR adj for HHF was 1.12 [1.00, 1.26] in intermediate and 1.17 [1.02, 1.35] in high-risk pts. There were significant interactions between the HF PRS and prior HF (P int 0.001), and NTproBNP (P int 0.038), respectively. In pts without prior HF (Fig A), compared to low-risk pts, the risk was increased in high- (HR adj 1.56 [1.25, 1.94], p<0.001) and intermediate-risk pts (HR adj 1.27 [1.05, 1.54], p=0.013). In contrast, there was no significant association in pts with known HF at baseline ( Fig B ). Similarly, the HF PRS was significantly associated with HHF in pts with low but not elevated NTproBNP at baseline ( Fig C ). Conclusion: Our study confirms the role of polygenic risk for HF and demonstrates that a 59 SNP PRS can identify pts at increased risk of future HF events beyond traditional clinical factors, specifically in patients without established HF or elevated NTproBNP. These findings suggest a potential application of a HF PRS for screening and early identification of pts at increased risk for HF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4114417
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4114417: Polygenic Risk in Heart Failure – Evaluating the Ability of a Polygenic Risk Score to Identify Risk of Future Heart Failure Events in 60,000 Patients from 6 TIMI Randomized Trials

Deepak L. Bhatt, Christian T. Ruff, Eugene Braunwald, Frederick Kamanu et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4114417: Polygenic Risk in Heart Failure – Evaluating the Ability of a Polygenic Risk Score to Identify Risk of Future Heart Failure Events in 60,000 Patients from 6 TIMI Randomized Trials

Deepak L. Bhatt, Christian T. Ruff, Eugene Braunwald, Frederick Kamanu, Marc S. Sabatine, Giorgio Melloni, Robert P. Giugliano, D. John Morrow, Benjamin M. Scirica, Yi-Pin Lai, Elliott Antman, Patrick T. Ellinor, Paul M. Haller, Michelle L. O’Donoghue, David Van Den Berg, Marc P. Bonaca, Nicholas Marston, Christopher P. Cannon, Stephen Wiviott
article en

Abstract

Background: The ability of polygenic risk scores (PRS) to predict heart failure (HF) beyond classic risk factors is unclear. Aims: To evaluate the risk of a HF PRS with incident hospitalization for HF (HHF) in patients with established cardiovascular disease. Methods: We analyzed a 59 SNP HF PRS (HERMES collaboration, Henry et al) in genotyped patients from six multinational TIMI randomized controlled trials (DECLARE, ENGAGE AF, FOURIER, PEGASUS, SAVOR, SOLID). Patients were stratified to low (quintile, Q1), intermediate (Q2-Q4), or high (Q5) genetic risk. We investigated the association of the HF PRS with incident HHF (median of 2.5 years) i) stratified by prior HF, and ii) across NTproBNP concentrations at baseline, using Cox-proportional hazard models. Results are reported as HR [95% CI], per 1-SD or with Q1 as a reference, and adjusted for ancestry (principal components 1-5), age, sex, trial, BMI, smoking, systolic BP, prior CAD, DM, AF, and eGFR. Results: In 59,906 pts (median age 66 years; 71% male; 26% prior HF), the HF PRS was associated with incident HHF (HR adj per 1-SD 1.08 [1.03, 1.13], p<0.001). Compared to low genetic risk pts, the HR adj for HHF was 1.12 [1.00, 1.26] in intermediate and 1.17 [1.02, 1.35] in high-risk pts. There were significant interactions between the HF PRS and prior HF (P int 0.001), and NTproBNP (P int 0.038), respectively. In pts without prior HF (Fig A), compared to low-risk pts, the risk was increased in high- (HR adj 1.56 [1.25, 1.94], p<0.001) and intermediate-risk pts (HR adj 1.27 [1.05, 1.54], p=0.013). In contrast, there was no significant association in pts with known HF at baseline ( Fig B ). Similarly, the HF PRS was significantly associated with HHF in pts with low but not elevated NTproBNP at baseline ( Fig C ). Conclusion: Our study confirms the role of polygenic risk for HF and demonstrates that a 59 SNP PRS can identify pts at increased risk of future HF events beyond traditional clinical factors, specifically in patients without established HF or elevated NTproBNP. These findings suggest a potential application of a HF PRS for screening and early identification of pts at increased risk for HF.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group (US), University of Colorado Denver (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.