Abstract 4118387: Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Echocardiogram Assessment Helps Distinguish Cardiomyopathy from Beat-to-Beat Variation in Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) can be associated with reductions in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) that improve upon conversion of AF to sinus rhythm. Such LVEF changes during AF may be due to LVEF measurement error from beat-to-beat variations related to AF itself. More precise artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced LVEF assessment could help distinguish between such LVEF “pseudo-reduction” during AF and true cardiomyopathy, thus potentially preventing unnecessary downstream workup and treatment. Methods: Using a transthoracic echocardiogram database at a large academic medical center, we identified all patients whose LVEF fell below 50% while in AF who had subsequent LVEF recovery to over 50% within 90 days after converting from AF to sinus rhythm. For echocardiograms in AF, we compared the clinically assessed LVEF with AI-enhanced LVEF assessment by EchoNet-Dynamic, a validated deep learning algorithm. Results: In our cohort of 84 patients, the mean age was 74 years old, 36.9% were female, and 26.2% non-White. The mean LVEF recovery was 19.3% (95% CI 17.1-21.5%) after converting from AF to sinus rhythm with a mean duration of 27.4 days between the AF and sinus rhythm echocardiograms (Figure 1). For AF echocardiograms, the LVEF when reassessed by deep learning was 8.4% (6.3-10.5%) higher than the original clinical read, resulting in 30.3% of patients being reclassified as no longer having a reduced LVEF less than 50% while in AF. Among these patients with LVEF reductions during AF, 27.4% and 19.0% were given a new or worsened heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) diagnosis, 15.5% underwent ischemic testing, and 17.9% were started on new HFrEF medications. Discussion: LVEF reductions during AF can lead to new HFrEF diagnosis, workup, and treatment. However, such LVEF reductions may be temporary and partially explained by undermeasurement of LVEF during AF. AI-enhanced LVEF assessment may help reduce such measurement errors during AF and thereby prevent overdiagnosis of HFrEF. Further research is needed to understand the clinical significance of true but temporary LVEF reductions during AF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4118387
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4118387: Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Echocardiogram Assessment Helps Distinguish Cardiomyopathy from Beat-to-Beat Variation in Atrial Fibrillation

Gloria J. Hong, Neal Yuan, Amey Vrudhula, David Ouyang
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
article

Abstract 4118387: Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Echocardiogram Assessment Helps Distinguish Cardiomyopathy from Beat-to-Beat Variation in Atrial Fibrillation

Gloria J. Hong, Neal Yuan, Amey Vrudhula, David Ouyang
article en

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) can be associated with reductions in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) that improve upon conversion of AF to sinus rhythm. Such LVEF changes during AF may be due to LVEF measurement error from beat-to-beat variations related to AF itself. More precise artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced LVEF assessment could help distinguish between such LVEF “pseudo-reduction” during AF and true cardiomyopathy, thus potentially preventing unnecessary downstream workup and treatment. Methods: Using a transthoracic echocardiogram database at a large academic medical center, we identified all patients whose LVEF fell below 50% while in AF who had subsequent LVEF recovery to over 50% within 90 days after converting from AF to sinus rhythm. For echocardiograms in AF, we compared the clinically assessed LVEF with AI-enhanced LVEF assessment by EchoNet-Dynamic, a validated deep learning algorithm. Results: In our cohort of 84 patients, the mean age was 74 years old, 36.9% were female, and 26.2% non-White. The mean LVEF recovery was 19.3% (95% CI 17.1-21.5%) after converting from AF to sinus rhythm with a mean duration of 27.4 days between the AF and sinus rhythm echocardiograms (Figure 1). For AF echocardiograms, the LVEF when reassessed by deep learning was 8.4% (6.3-10.5%) higher than the original clinical read, resulting in 30.3% of patients being reclassified as no longer having a reduced LVEF less than 50% while in AF. Among these patients with LVEF reductions during AF, 27.4% and 19.0% were given a new or worsened heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) diagnosis, 15.5% underwent ischemic testing, and 17.9% were started on new HFrEF medications. Discussion: LVEF reductions during AF can lead to new HFrEF diagnosis, workup, and treatment. However, such LVEF reductions may be temporary and partially explained by undermeasurement of LVEF during AF. AI-enhanced LVEF assessment may help reduce such measurement errors during AF and thereby prevent overdiagnosis of HFrEF. Further research is needed to understand the clinical significance of true but temporary LVEF reductions during AF.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.