Abstract 4116093: High Intensity Statin Use Improved ASCVD Outcomes in Patients with Severe Hyperlipidemia in a Primary Prevention Cohort

Background: High intensity statin therapy is currently recommended for primary prevention of ASCVD in patients with severe hyperlipidemia (HLD), defined as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of ≥190 mg/dL. We examined statin use for patients with severe HLD and associated ASCVD outcomes in a large contemporary healthcare network. Methods: Using EMR data, patients between the ages of 20 and 79 with a lipid bloodwork result between 2013 and 2017 without ASCVD by ICD9 and ICD10 codes were identified. Patients with LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL were identified. Statin use was stratified by no statin, guideline directed statin intensity (GDSI), and less than guideline directed statin intensity (<GDSI). Cox proportional hazards (HR) models were used to assess the relationship between statin use, future ASCVD events, and all-cause mortality. Time to initiation of GDSI was calculated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods. Results: Out of 282,298 primary prevention patients, a total of 5,205 (1.8%) had LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL. These patients were 55.6% female and had an average age of 52.5 ± 12.2. At first encounter, 3.7% were on GDSI. Over a 5-year follow up, KM probabilities revealed 42% of high-risk patients with severe HLD not initially on GDSI would achieve new GDSI use. Compared to patients on GDSI, those on no statin therapy were at significantly higher risk of MI (HR = 2.36, 95% CI [1.38 – 4.04]) and stroke/TIA (HR= 2.70, 95% CI [1.43 – 5.09]); both p < 0.05. There was no significant difference in risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 1.41, 95% CI [0.90 – 2.21]). Patients on <GDSI were found to have significantly higher risk of MI (HR = 1.72, 95% CI [1.05 – 2.81]) compared to patients on GDSI. There was no significant difference between the GDSI and <GDSI groups in risk of stroke (HR = 1.28, 95% CI [0.69-2.37] and all-cause mortality (HR = 0.98, 95% CI [0.65-1.47]). Conclusion: Among primary prevention patients with severe HLD, high intensity statins are underutilized. Prevalence of this suboptimal use of statins is linked to greater risk of ASCVD events. Healthcare system-wide interventions can identify measures to assess burden of high-risk patients with severe HLD and implement lipid-lowering therapies optimally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4116093
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4116093: High Intensity Statin Use Improved ASCVD Outcomes in Patients with Severe Hyperlipidemia in a Primary Prevention Cohort

Oscar C. Marroquin, Floyd Thoma, Anum Saeed, Suresh Mulukutla et al.
Circulation
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

Abstract 4116093: High Intensity Statin Use Improved ASCVD Outcomes in Patients with Severe Hyperlipidemia in a Primary Prevention Cohort

Oscar C. Marroquin, Floyd Thoma, Anum Saeed, Suresh Mulukutla, Anurag Mehta, Vijay Nambi, Anandita Agarwala, Jianhui Zhu, Cameron Hallihan
article en

Abstract

Background: High intensity statin therapy is currently recommended for primary prevention of ASCVD in patients with severe hyperlipidemia (HLD), defined as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of ≥190 mg/dL. We examined statin use for patients with severe HLD and associated ASCVD outcomes in a large contemporary healthcare network. Methods: Using EMR data, patients between the ages of 20 and 79 with a lipid bloodwork result between 2013 and 2017 without ASCVD by ICD9 and ICD10 codes were identified. Patients with LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL were identified. Statin use was stratified by no statin, guideline directed statin intensity (GDSI), and less than guideline directed statin intensity (<GDSI). Cox proportional hazards (HR) models were used to assess the relationship between statin use, future ASCVD events, and all-cause mortality. Time to initiation of GDSI was calculated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods. Results: Out of 282,298 primary prevention patients, a total of 5,205 (1.8%) had LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL. These patients were 55.6% female and had an average age of 52.5 ± 12.2. At first encounter, 3.7% were on GDSI. Over a 5-year follow up, KM probabilities revealed 42% of high-risk patients with severe HLD not initially on GDSI would achieve new GDSI use. Compared to patients on GDSI, those on no statin therapy were at significantly higher risk of MI (HR = 2.36, 95% CI [1.38 – 4.04]) and stroke/TIA (HR= 2.70, 95% CI [1.43 – 5.09]); both p < 0.05. There was no significant difference in risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 1.41, 95% CI [0.90 – 2.21]). Patients on <GDSI were found to have significantly higher risk of MI (HR = 1.72, 95% CI [1.05 – 2.81]) compared to patients on GDSI. There was no significant difference between the GDSI and <GDSI groups in risk of stroke (HR = 1.28, 95% CI [0.69-2.37] and all-cause mortality (HR = 0.98, 95% CI [0.65-1.47]). Conclusion: Among primary prevention patients with severe HLD, high intensity statins are underutilized. Prevalence of this suboptimal use of statins is linked to greater risk of ASCVD events. Healthcare system-wide interventions can identify measures to assess burden of high-risk patients with severe HLD and implement lipid-lowering therapies optimally.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of Pittsburgh (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Baylor Scott & White Health (US), New York University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.