Abstract 4114220: Majority of Patients with New Ventricular Dysfunction After Acute COVID-19 Infection Did Not Have Cardiac Recovery

Background: It is still not well understood whether cardiac injury observed during acute COVID-19 infection extends after recovery from the initial viral infection. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of left and right ventricular dysfunction in patients hospitalized with acute COVID-19 and evaluate for cardiac recovery. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted. Adult patients were identified by hospitalizations using ICD-10 code U07.1 from March 2020 to October 2021. Patients were included if they had: 1) acute COVID-19 infection confirmed by RT-PCR and 2) a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) performed during their hospitalization. Clinical and echocardiographic data were collected and analyzed. Longitudinal TTE parameters were obtained from follow-up studies performed after discharge. Results: A total of 750 patients (mean age 64.3 ± 15.3 years, 60.0% male) were included. The average time to follow-up TTE was 8.7± 7.4 months. 133 patients (17.7%) had new LV dysfunction seen on TTE ( Figure 1 ). LV recovery (defined as normalization of LVEF or improvement of LVEF by > 10% from baseline) was observed in 28 of 74 (37.8%) survivors. 9 of 26 patients (34.6%) who had a follow-up TTE <6 months post-discharge recovered their LV function, while 19 of 48 patients (39.6%) who had a follow-up TTE ≥6 months had LV recovery. 94 of 725 patients (13.0%) with reported RV parameters had new RV dysfunction seen on TTE. RV recovery (defined as normalization of RV function) was observed in 11 of 38 (28.9%) survivors. 6 of 18 patients (33.3%) who had a follow-up TTE <6 months post-discharge recovered their RV function, while 5 of 20 patients (25%) who had a follow-up TTE ≥6 months had RV recovery. Conclusions: Most surviving patients who developed new LV or RV dysfunction did not recover their ventricular function at follow-up, but recovery extended beyond 6 months follow-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4114220
Primary Topic
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4114220: Majority of Patients with New Ventricular Dysfunction After Acute COVID-19 Infection Did Not Have Cardiac Recovery

Sharon Andrade‐Bucknor, Crystal Yan, Beatriz Rivera Rodriguez
Circulation
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
article

Abstract 4114220: Majority of Patients with New Ventricular Dysfunction After Acute COVID-19 Infection Did Not Have Cardiac Recovery

Sharon Andrade‐Bucknor, Crystal Yan, Beatriz Rivera Rodriguez
article en

Abstract

Background: It is still not well understood whether cardiac injury observed during acute COVID-19 infection extends after recovery from the initial viral infection. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of left and right ventricular dysfunction in patients hospitalized with acute COVID-19 and evaluate for cardiac recovery. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted. Adult patients were identified by hospitalizations using ICD-10 code U07.1 from March 2020 to October 2021. Patients were included if they had: 1) acute COVID-19 infection confirmed by RT-PCR and 2) a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) performed during their hospitalization. Clinical and echocardiographic data were collected and analyzed. Longitudinal TTE parameters were obtained from follow-up studies performed after discharge. Results: A total of 750 patients (mean age 64.3 ± 15.3 years, 60.0% male) were included. The average time to follow-up TTE was 8.7± 7.4 months. 133 patients (17.7%) had new LV dysfunction seen on TTE ( Figure 1 ). LV recovery (defined as normalization of LVEF or improvement of LVEF by > 10% from baseline) was observed in 28 of 74 (37.8%) survivors. 9 of 26 patients (34.6%) who had a follow-up TTE <6 months post-discharge recovered their LV function, while 19 of 48 patients (39.6%) who had a follow-up TTE ≥6 months had LV recovery. 94 of 725 patients (13.0%) with reported RV parameters had new RV dysfunction seen on TTE. RV recovery (defined as normalization of RV function) was observed in 11 of 38 (28.9%) survivors. 6 of 18 patients (33.3%) who had a follow-up TTE <6 months post-discharge recovered their RV function, while 5 of 20 patients (25%) who had a follow-up TTE ≥6 months had RV recovery. Conclusions: Most surviving patients who developed new LV or RV dysfunction did not recover their ventricular function at follow-up, but recovery extended beyond 6 months follow-up.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of Miami (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.