Human-AI coevolution

Human-AI coevolution, defined as a process in which humans and AI algorithms continuously influence each other, increasingly characterises our society, but is understudied in artificial intelligence and complexity science literature. Recommender systems and assistants play a prominent role in human-AI coevolution, as they permeate many facets of daily life and influence human choices through online platforms. The interaction between users and AI results in a potentially endless feedback loop, wherein users' choices generate data to train AI models, which, in turn, shape subsequent user preferences. This human-AI feedback loop has peculiar characteristics compared to traditional human-machine interaction and gives rise to complex and often “unintended” systemic outcomes. This paper introduces human-AI coevolution as the cornerstone for a new field of study at the intersection between AI and complexity science focused on the theoretical, empirical, and mathematical investigation of the human-AI feedback loop. In doing so, we: (i) outline the pros and cons of existing methodologies and highlight shortcomings and potential ways for capturing feedback loop mechanisms; (ii) propose a reflection at the intersection between complexity science, AI and society; (iii) provide real-world examples for different human-AI ecosystems; and (iv) illustrate challenges to the creation of such a field of study, conceptualising them at increasing levels of abstraction, i.e., scientific, legal and socio-political.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Intelligence
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2024.104244
Citations
39
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
44.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human-AI coevolution

Alex Pentland, Andrea Passarella, Fosca Giannotti, Albert-Ĺaszló Barabási et al.
39 citations
Artificial Intelligence
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
44.15
article

Human-AI coevolution

Alex Pentland, Andrea Passarella, Fosca Giannotti, Albert-Ĺaszló Barabási, Alistair Knott, János Kertész, Dino Pedreschi, Alessandro Vespignani, John Shawe‐Taylor, Virginia Dignum, Paul Lukowicz, Luca Pappalardo, Frank Dignum, Ricardo Baeza‐Yates, Tina Eliassi‐Rad, Yannis Ioannidis, Emanuele Ferragina
article en
39 citations

Abstract

Human-AI coevolution, defined as a process in which humans and AI algorithms continuously influence each other, increasingly characterises our society, but is understudied in artificial intelligence and complexity science literature. Recommender systems and assistants play a prominent role in human-AI coevolution, as they permeate many facets of daily life and influence human choices through online platforms. The interaction between users and AI results in a potentially endless feedback loop, wherein users' choices generate data to train AI models, which, in turn, shape subsequent user preferences. This human-AI feedback loop has peculiar characteristics compared to traditional human-machine interaction and gives rise to complex and often “unintended” systemic outcomes. This paper introduces human-AI coevolution as the cornerstone for a new field of study at the intersection between AI and complexity science focused on the theoretical, empirical, and mathematical investigation of the human-AI feedback loop. In doing so, we: (i) outline the pros and cons of existing methodologies and highlight shortcomings and potential ways for capturing feedback loop mechanisms; (ii) propose a reflection at the intersection between complexity science, AI and society; (iii) provide real-world examples for different human-AI ecosystems; and (iv) illustrate challenges to the creation of such a field of study, conceptualising them at increasing levels of abstraction, i.e., scientific, legal and socio-political.

Artificial IntelligenceVol. 339
University of Pisa (IT), Northeastern University (US), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Kaiserslautern (DE), Scuola Normale Superiore (IT), Central European University (AT), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris (FR), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), Consorzio Pisa Ricerche (IT), Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IT), Instituto di Biofisica (ES), Silicon Valley University (US), National Research Council (IT), Athena Research and Innovation Center In Information Communication & Knowledge Technologies (GR), Centre de recherche sur les Inégalités Sociales (FR), University College London (GB), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), University of Otago (NZ), Umeå University (SE)
European Commission, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Eesti Teadusagentuur, Austrian Science Fund, Bulgarian National Science Fund, Université de Paris, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, CHIST-ERA
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
44.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.