Abstract 4122780: Muscle Quality Defines Sarcopenic Obesity in Older Adults In Association with Cardiac Function

Background: Obesity phenotypes are increasingly used to define cardiovascular diseases (CVD) risks. Age-related deteriorations in skeletal muscle function have ignited interest in the co-occurrence of sarcopenia and obesity in older adults. However, the traditional definition of sarcopenia (low appendicular skeletal mass [ASM] and handgrip strength [HGS]) may lead to underdiagnosis of sarcopenic obesity (SO) in overweight individuals (due to higher muscle mass). To address this enigma, we evaluated the use of muscle quality (MQ), as an alternative metric for SO, in association with cardiac function. Methods: Community older adults without CVD were prospectively annotated for skeletal mass, HGS and cardiac function via bioimpedance analysis, dynamometer, and simultaneous acquisition of echocardiography respectively. Sarcopenia was defined by low ASM and low HGS. Low MQ (HGS divided by upper body ASM) was defined by males<5.76kg/kg and females<5.475kg/kg. Aerobic capacity (VO2 max,ml/kg/min) was computed by a physical activity prediction model. Mitral early diastolic inflow velocity to early diastolic annular tissue velocity (E/e’) and early to late diastolic inflow velocity (E/A) ratios were recorded. Results: Overall, low MQ was prevalent (34.3%) in n=574 participants (59% females), but only 17.4% fulfilled sarcopenia diagnosis. Higher BMI correlated with higher ASM but lower MQ (Fig 1). Low MQ prevalence was higher in the obese compared to the non-obese (64.7% vs 30.2%, p<0.0001). Low MQ group was significantly older (69.0±10.4 vs 64.8±14.0 years, p<0.0001), had higher prevalence of dyslipidemia (49.2% vs 40.9% p=0.002) and hypertension (45.2% vs 39.3% p<0.0001) than the normal MQ group. The low MQ group had greater left ventricular mass (129±45 vs 114±44, grams, p<0.0001), left atrial volumes (37±14 vs 33±13, ml, p=0.001), and demonstrated a greater degree of diastolic dysfunction (lower E/A (0.89±0.28 vs 1.1±0.49, p<0.0001 and higher E/e’(8.63±2.42 vs 8.00±2.58, p=0.005), compared to the high MQ. VO2 max was lower in low MQ group (33±5.7 vs 36±6.7, p<0.0001). By regression, low MQ was associated with E/A (β=-0.119, adjusted p<0.0001) and VO2 max (β=-0.137, p<0.0001) (Table 1). Conclusion: Muscle quality is a useful metric of muscle function for sarcopenia in obese older adults. The associations between low MQ with diastolic dysfunction and reduced aerobic capacity corroborate the clinical impact of MQ as a defining metric of sarcopenia in obesity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4122780
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4122780: Muscle Quality Defines Sarcopenic Obesity in Older Adults In Association with Cardiac Function

See Hooi Ewe, Jie Jun Wong, Ru‐San Tan, Loon Yee Teo et al.
Circulation
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Abstract 4122780: Muscle Quality Defines Sarcopenic Obesity in Older Adults In Association with Cardiac Function

See Hooi Ewe, Jie Jun Wong, Ru‐San Tan, Loon Yee Teo, Fei Gao, Sarah Ying Tse Tan, Angela S. Koh, Hong Chang Tan, Wee Shiong Lim, Glades Tan
article en

Abstract

Background: Obesity phenotypes are increasingly used to define cardiovascular diseases (CVD) risks. Age-related deteriorations in skeletal muscle function have ignited interest in the co-occurrence of sarcopenia and obesity in older adults. However, the traditional definition of sarcopenia (low appendicular skeletal mass [ASM] and handgrip strength [HGS]) may lead to underdiagnosis of sarcopenic obesity (SO) in overweight individuals (due to higher muscle mass). To address this enigma, we evaluated the use of muscle quality (MQ), as an alternative metric for SO, in association with cardiac function. Methods: Community older adults without CVD were prospectively annotated for skeletal mass, HGS and cardiac function via bioimpedance analysis, dynamometer, and simultaneous acquisition of echocardiography respectively. Sarcopenia was defined by low ASM and low HGS. Low MQ (HGS divided by upper body ASM) was defined by males<5.76kg/kg and females<5.475kg/kg. Aerobic capacity (VO2 max,ml/kg/min) was computed by a physical activity prediction model. Mitral early diastolic inflow velocity to early diastolic annular tissue velocity (E/e’) and early to late diastolic inflow velocity (E/A) ratios were recorded. Results: Overall, low MQ was prevalent (34.3%) in n=574 participants (59% females), but only 17.4% fulfilled sarcopenia diagnosis. Higher BMI correlated with higher ASM but lower MQ (Fig 1). Low MQ prevalence was higher in the obese compared to the non-obese (64.7% vs 30.2%, p<0.0001). Low MQ group was significantly older (69.0±10.4 vs 64.8±14.0 years, p<0.0001), had higher prevalence of dyslipidemia (49.2% vs 40.9% p=0.002) and hypertension (45.2% vs 39.3% p<0.0001) than the normal MQ group. The low MQ group had greater left ventricular mass (129±45 vs 114±44, grams, p<0.0001), left atrial volumes (37±14 vs 33±13, ml, p=0.001), and demonstrated a greater degree of diastolic dysfunction (lower E/A (0.89±0.28 vs 1.1±0.49, p<0.0001 and higher E/e’(8.63±2.42 vs 8.00±2.58, p=0.005), compared to the high MQ. VO2 max was lower in low MQ group (33±5.7 vs 36±6.7, p<0.0001). By regression, low MQ was associated with E/A (β=-0.119, adjusted p<0.0001) and VO2 max (β=-0.137, p<0.0001) (Table 1). Conclusion: Muscle quality is a useful metric of muscle function for sarcopenia in obese older adults. The associations between low MQ with diastolic dysfunction and reduced aerobic capacity corroborate the clinical impact of MQ as a defining metric of sarcopenia in obesity.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Singapore General Hospital (SG), Tan Tock Seng Hospital (SG), National Heart Centre Singapore (SG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.