Abstract 4121624: Ambulatory Inotropic Support in Patients with Stage D Heart Failure Does Not Increase ICD Therapies

Background: Ambulatory inotropic infusions can be used as a palliative therapy (PT) or bridge to advanced therapies in end-stage heart failure (ESHF) patients, many of whom have implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Research Questions: How often do patients receive ICD therapies after initiation of outpatient inotropic support and how often is defibrillation inactivated? Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients discharged from an academic tertiary medical center with a new prescription for inotropic therapy between November 2017 and March 2023. Clinical data, Palliative Care consultation, and ICD interrogations before and after inotrope initiation were extracted from the electronic health record. Results: The cohort comprised 45 patients discharged on new inotropic support, including 22 (49%) with intent of PT and 23 (51%) as a bridge to advanced therapies (Figure). Among PT patients, 15 (68%) had an ICD in place with only 4 having ICD therapies deactivated at discharge. Only 2 additional PT patients had a documented discussion regarding ongoing ICD therapies. By 1 year, 4 (18%) PT patients were transitioned to hospice and 13 (59%) had died, with only 1 additional patient having ICD deactivation. Of 28 patients discharged on inotropic infusions with ICD therapies on (both PT and bridge patients), only 4 patients had ICD therapies turned off later and no ICD shocks were reported for the year following initiation of inotropic support. Conclusion: In a series of 45 patients initiated on inotropic support for PT or bridge to advanced therapies, the majority (77%) had an active ICD, but therapies were rarely delivered. Notably, there were very few documented discussions regarding ICD therapies in PT patients even with specialty Palliative Care consultation. In patients with ESHF initiated on inotropic support as PT, most patients chose to leave ICD therapies in place. For those patients, there was a low rate of ICD therapies delivered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4121624
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4121624: Ambulatory Inotropic Support in Patients with Stage D Heart Failure Does Not Increase ICD Therapies

Travis D. Richardson, Eric Farber‐Eger, Jamie Pfaff, Lynne W. Stevenson et al.
Circulation
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Abstract 4121624: Ambulatory Inotropic Support in Patients with Stage D Heart Failure Does Not Increase ICD Therapies

Travis D. Richardson, Eric Farber‐Eger, Jamie Pfaff, Lynne W. Stevenson, Quinn S. Wells, Dawn Pedrotty, Kathryn I. Sunthankar, M. M. Skelton, Henry Ooi
article en

Abstract

Background: Ambulatory inotropic infusions can be used as a palliative therapy (PT) or bridge to advanced therapies in end-stage heart failure (ESHF) patients, many of whom have implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Research Questions: How often do patients receive ICD therapies after initiation of outpatient inotropic support and how often is defibrillation inactivated? Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients discharged from an academic tertiary medical center with a new prescription for inotropic therapy between November 2017 and March 2023. Clinical data, Palliative Care consultation, and ICD interrogations before and after inotrope initiation were extracted from the electronic health record. Results: The cohort comprised 45 patients discharged on new inotropic support, including 22 (49%) with intent of PT and 23 (51%) as a bridge to advanced therapies (Figure). Among PT patients, 15 (68%) had an ICD in place with only 4 having ICD therapies deactivated at discharge. Only 2 additional PT patients had a documented discussion regarding ongoing ICD therapies. By 1 year, 4 (18%) PT patients were transitioned to hospice and 13 (59%) had died, with only 1 additional patient having ICD deactivation. Of 28 patients discharged on inotropic infusions with ICD therapies on (both PT and bridge patients), only 4 patients had ICD therapies turned off later and no ICD shocks were reported for the year following initiation of inotropic support. Conclusion: In a series of 45 patients initiated on inotropic support for PT or bridge to advanced therapies, the majority (77%) had an active ICD, but therapies were rarely delivered. Notably, there were very few documented discussions regarding ICD therapies in PT patients even with specialty Palliative Care consultation. In patients with ESHF initiated on inotropic support as PT, most patients chose to leave ICD therapies in place. For those patients, there was a low rate of ICD therapies delivered.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.