Abstract 4116639: Efficacy of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Pure Native Aortic Valve Regurgitation: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is the preferred treatment option for patients with severe aortic regurgitation (AR). Recently, several patients with mixed aortic valve disease, comprising severe aortic stenosis (AS) and at least moderate AR, have been successfully treated with TAVR. However, the treatment of severe native aortic valve regurgitation (NAVR) without AS remains a matter of contention, and the efficacy of TAVR remains uncertain. Aims: The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and the incidence of device success. The secondary outcomes included incidence of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, major bleeding, acute kidney injury (AKI) ≥ stage 2, moderate-to-severe paravalvular leak (PVL), permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM), and post-procedural moderate-to-severe AR. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus and ClinicalTrials.gov for published articles from inception until 2nd April 2024 to evaluate clinical outcomes of TAVR in patients with NAVR. The statistical analysis was conducted using R-Studio 5.3.3. The rates of events with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and the heterogeneity was assessed using p-value and I 2 statistics. Results: A total of 23 published articles with 4,397 patients were included. All-cause mortality at 30 days was 12% (95% CI: 6% to 23%), while device success was 86% (95% CI: 81% to 92%). The incidence of complications such as MI (3%, 95% CI: 2% to 4%), stroke (3%, 95% CI: 2% to 3%), major bleeding (8%, 95% CI: 5% to 11%), AKI ≥ stage 2 (8%, 95% CI: 5% to 12%), and major vascular complications were relatively low (6%, 95% CI: 4% to 7%). PPM was required for 15% of patients (95% CI: 11% to 18%). PVL was observed in 10% of patients (95% CI: 2% to 41%) and post-procedural moderate-to-severe AR occurred in 9% of patients (95% CI: 4% to 20%). Conclusion: TAVR is a viable and reasonable option for a specific population with NAVR. Nevertheless, it is imperative to conduct larger studies with a longer duration of follow-up to obtain more robust evidence of the feasibility of TAVR in patients with NAVR. </div>