Abstract 4117927: Prevalence of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Among Consecutive Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Using WatchPAT Home Sleep Testing: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and health system costs. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent condition affecting more than one third of the global adult population and, among patients with comorbid AF, contributes to poor AF related quality of life. However, the prevalence of undiagnosed OSA in the general AF population is unknown. Methods: In this pragmatic, phase IV prospective cohort study, we performed sleep testing on consecutively enrolled ambulatory AF patients for OSA using a cloud-based disposable home sleep test (the WatchPAT system). The primary outcome of our study was the prevalence of undiagnosed mild (5≤AHI<15) or moderate/severe (AHI≥15) OSA in the general AF population. A prespecified power analysis supports 80% power to detect a <5% difference in OSA prevalence compared to the general population (defined by AHI cut-offs of ≥5 or ≥15). Results: We performed sleep testing in 180 AF patients. Enrollment concluded early after a prespecified interim power analysis showed a larger than predicted difference of OSA prevalence between AF patients and the general population. Among the patients tested, 126 (70.4%) had paroxysmal AF, and 53 (29.6%) had persistent/long standing persistent AF. None had previous sleep testing. Our results show that the prevalence of OSA was 83.3% by AHI≥5 and 47.2% had moderate/severe OSA (AHI≥15). Patients with persistent or long standing persistent AF demonstrated even higher rates of OSA with 51 (96.3%) testing positive for OSA (AHI≥5) and 35 (64.2%) with moderate/severe OSA (AHI≥15). Conversely, standardized OSA screening instruments (Stop-BANG questionnaire or Epworth Sleepiness Scale) were poorly predictive of OSA in AF patients (AUC 0.66 and AUC 0.44, respectively). Conclusions: Undiagnosed OSA is highly prevalent in the general AF population. Our results demonstrate that OSA prevalence in AF patients exceeds that in the general population with a high degree of confidence. Widely used clinical prediction instruments cannot effectively be used to guide sleep testing decisions in AF patients. Our results suggest routine OSA testing should be performed in the comprehensive evaluation of all AF patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4117927
Primary Topic
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4117927: Prevalence of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Among Consecutive Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Using WatchPAT Home Sleep Testing: A Prospective Cohort Study

Eric H. Mills, Jorge E. Romero, Elliott M. Antman, Tamar Sofer et al.
Circulation
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
article

Abstract 4117927: Prevalence of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Among Consecutive Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Using WatchPAT Home Sleep Testing: A Prospective Cohort Study

Eric H. Mills, Jorge E. Romero, Elliott M. Antman, Tamar Sofer, Thomas M. Tadros, William H. Sauer, Michael Cassidy, Sogol Javaheri, Paul C. Zei, David Martín
article en

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and health system costs. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent condition affecting more than one third of the global adult population and, among patients with comorbid AF, contributes to poor AF related quality of life. However, the prevalence of undiagnosed OSA in the general AF population is unknown. Methods: In this pragmatic, phase IV prospective cohort study, we performed sleep testing on consecutively enrolled ambulatory AF patients for OSA using a cloud-based disposable home sleep test (the WatchPAT system). The primary outcome of our study was the prevalence of undiagnosed mild (5≤AHI<15) or moderate/severe (AHI≥15) OSA in the general AF population. A prespecified power analysis supports 80% power to detect a <5% difference in OSA prevalence compared to the general population (defined by AHI cut-offs of ≥5 or ≥15). Results: We performed sleep testing in 180 AF patients. Enrollment concluded early after a prespecified interim power analysis showed a larger than predicted difference of OSA prevalence between AF patients and the general population. Among the patients tested, 126 (70.4%) had paroxysmal AF, and 53 (29.6%) had persistent/long standing persistent AF. None had previous sleep testing. Our results show that the prevalence of OSA was 83.3% by AHI≥5 and 47.2% had moderate/severe OSA (AHI≥15). Patients with persistent or long standing persistent AF demonstrated even higher rates of OSA with 51 (96.3%) testing positive for OSA (AHI≥5) and 35 (64.2%) with moderate/severe OSA (AHI≥15). Conversely, standardized OSA screening instruments (Stop-BANG questionnaire or Epworth Sleepiness Scale) were poorly predictive of OSA in AF patients (AUC 0.66 and AUC 0.44, respectively). Conclusions: Undiagnosed OSA is highly prevalent in the general AF population. Our results demonstrate that OSA prevalence in AF patients exceeds that in the general population with a high degree of confidence. Widely used clinical prediction instruments cannot effectively be used to guide sleep testing decisions in AF patients. Our results suggest routine OSA testing should be performed in the comprehensive evaluation of all AF patients.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Deaconess Hospital (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
No poverty, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.