Abstract 4122284: HEART Score Classification of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

Introduction: Risk stratifying diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with chest pain in the emergency department (ED) can pose significant challenges because of atypical symptoms, non-specific ECG changes, and elevated baseline troponin levels. This study aims to evaluate HEART Score performance in DM versus non-DM patients. Methods: A prospective observational cohort study included chest pain patients transported by Emergency Medical Services to University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-affiliated hospitals. Data collection involved extracting data from electronic health records, including both DM and non-DM patients with chest pain. The HEART Score was retrospectively calculated by impartial assessors.The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 30 days. This analysis included the classification performance of bivariate comparisons between the HEART Score and ACS outcomes using the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC). Results: 4,058 patients were included. 52.7% were male, 42% were white, there was a mean age of 59.24 years (16.13 SD), 28.63% had DM, and 22.1% had MACE. MACE prevalence was 19.7% in non-DM patients and 28% in patients with DM. The AUC demonstrated more robust discriminatory ability of the HEART Score in non-DM (AUC = 0.81) (95% CI 0.79-0.83) versus DM patients (AUC = 0.74) (95% CI 0.71-0.78) (p 0.001). The performance of HEART Score components, including history, age, and risk factors, exhibited better significant predictive capability for MACE in non-DM patients compared to DM patients. Conversely, the HEART-ECG and troponin components were not different between the DM and non-DM groups. The HEART Score demonstrates better performance in White individuals and females when contrasted with males and Black individuals. Nevertheless, these disparities do not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: The HEART Score performs differently in DM versus non-DM patients, with stronger discrimination observed in non-DM individuals. The troponin and ECG components exhibit poorer performance in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients within the context of the HEART Score. This underscores the complexity of risk assessment in DM patients with chest pain and suggests the necessity for further exploration and refinement of risk stratification strategies in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4122284
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4122284: HEART Score Classification of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

Mohammad Alhamaydeh, Huabin Luo, Salah S. Al‐Zaiti, Stephanie Helman et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
article

Abstract 4122284: HEART Score Classification of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

Mohammad Alhamaydeh, Huabin Luo, Salah S. Al‐Zaiti, Stephanie Helman, Ahmed AlQaqaa
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Risk stratifying diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with chest pain in the emergency department (ED) can pose significant challenges because of atypical symptoms, non-specific ECG changes, and elevated baseline troponin levels. This study aims to evaluate HEART Score performance in DM versus non-DM patients. Methods: A prospective observational cohort study included chest pain patients transported by Emergency Medical Services to University of Pittsburgh Medical Center-affiliated hospitals. Data collection involved extracting data from electronic health records, including both DM and non-DM patients with chest pain. The HEART Score was retrospectively calculated by impartial assessors.The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 30 days. This analysis included the classification performance of bivariate comparisons between the HEART Score and ACS outcomes using the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC). Results: 4,058 patients were included. 52.7% were male, 42% were white, there was a mean age of 59.24 years (16.13 SD), 28.63% had DM, and 22.1% had MACE. MACE prevalence was 19.7% in non-DM patients and 28% in patients with DM. The AUC demonstrated more robust discriminatory ability of the HEART Score in non-DM (AUC = 0.81) (95% CI 0.79-0.83) versus DM patients (AUC = 0.74) (95% CI 0.71-0.78) (p 0.001). The performance of HEART Score components, including history, age, and risk factors, exhibited better significant predictive capability for MACE in non-DM patients compared to DM patients. Conversely, the HEART-ECG and troponin components were not different between the DM and non-DM groups. The HEART Score demonstrates better performance in White individuals and females when contrasted with males and Black individuals. Nevertheless, these disparities do not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: The HEART Score performs differently in DM versus non-DM patients, with stronger discrimination observed in non-DM individuals. The troponin and ECG components exhibit poorer performance in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients within the context of the HEART Score. This underscores the complexity of risk assessment in DM patients with chest pain and suggests the necessity for further exploration and refinement of risk stratification strategies in this population.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of Jordan (JO), University of Pittsburgh (US), East Carolina University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.