Verification of Operational Forecast Models in Cases of Extratropical Transition of North Atlantic Hurricanes

Abstract Operational forecast models are necessary for the prediction of weather events in real time. Verification of these models must be performed to assess model skills and areas in need of improvement, particularly with different types of weather events that may occur. Despite the devastating impacts that can be caused by tropical cyclones (TCs) that undergo extratropical transition (ET) and become post-tropical cyclones (PTCs), these storms have not been extensively studied in the context of short-term weather prediction. This study completes the first analysis of the Global Forecast System (GFS) and a preoperational version of the newly operational Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (HAFS) models in forecasting the occurrence of ET and the rainfall associated with ET storms in the North Atlantic basin. GFS’s skill exceeds that of HAFS in forecasting the occurrence of ET, but HAFS tends to have lower track and rain-rate errors in the fully tropical phase of ET storms’ life cycles. Both models simulate rain rates that are often too high near the storm center and fail to capture the larger area of moderate rain rates that greatly contributes to total rainfall accumulation. The discrepancies in rain rates between the models and Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) could be attributed to the models’ tendency to keep storms too intense and too compact with an overly strong warm core, even throughout the ET process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Weather and Forecasting
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-24-0011.1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geological and Geophysical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Verification of Operational Forecast Models in Cases of Extratropical Transition of North Atlantic Hurricanes

Ghassan J. Alaka, Andrew Hazelton, Kevin A. Reed, Erica Bower
1 citations
Weather and Forecasting
Geological and Geophysical Studies
0.83
article

Verification of Operational Forecast Models in Cases of Extratropical Transition of North Atlantic Hurricanes

Ghassan J. Alaka, Andrew Hazelton, Kevin A. Reed, Erica Bower
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Operational forecast models are necessary for the prediction of weather events in real time. Verification of these models must be performed to assess model skills and areas in need of improvement, particularly with different types of weather events that may occur. Despite the devastating impacts that can be caused by tropical cyclones (TCs) that undergo extratropical transition (ET) and become post-tropical cyclones (PTCs), these storms have not been extensively studied in the context of short-term weather prediction. This study completes the first analysis of the Global Forecast System (GFS) and a preoperational version of the newly operational Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (HAFS) models in forecasting the occurrence of ET and the rainfall associated with ET storms in the North Atlantic basin. GFS’s skill exceeds that of HAFS in forecasting the occurrence of ET, but HAFS tends to have lower track and rain-rate errors in the fully tropical phase of ET storms’ life cycles. Both models simulate rain rates that are often too high near the storm center and fail to capture the larger area of moderate rain rates that greatly contributes to total rainfall accumulation. The discrepancies in rain rates between the models and Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) could be attributed to the models’ tendency to keep storms too intense and too compact with an overly strong warm core, even throughout the ET process.

Weather and ForecastingVol. 39(11)
State University of New York (US), University of Miami (US), NOAA Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratories (US), Stony Brook University (US)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Geological and Geophysical Studies
0.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.