Abstract 4120957: Endovascular Thrombectomy Versus Medical Management for Acute Ischemic Stroke with Large Infarct: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background: Endovascular therapy (EVT) has revolutionized the treatment of acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions. Despite the increasing evidence for EVT, its efficacy remains understudied in patients with acute ischemic stroke with large infarcts. Patients with large-volume ischemic strokes are excluded from major randomized controlled trials (RCTs) despite contributing up to 25% of all acute ischemic strokes. Aim: This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical management in patients with acute ischemic stroke with large infarct. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review on PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library from inception to 15th May 2024 for RCTs. The inverse-variance random-effects model was used to pool odds ratio (OR) and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. The statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: 6 RCTs with 1887 patients (945: EVT and 942: medical management) were included. The mean age in both EVT and medical management groups was 70 ± 11.4 years. EVT was associated with a better modified Rankin Score (mRS) at 90 days [OR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1.38, 2.04; p<0.00001], mRS at 90 days (0-2) [OR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.87, 3.27; p<0.00001], mRS at 90 days (0-3) [OR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.56, 2.46; p<0.00001], and early neurological improvement [RR: 2.35; 95% CI: 1.79, 3.10; p<0.00001] compared to medical management. EVT was also associated with a higher risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage [RR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.09, 2.66; p=0.02]. The 90-day mortality [RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.72, 1.02; p=0.08] was comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: Patients with acute ischemic stroke with large infarct had superior functional outcomes with EVT as compared to medical management alone. However, EVT was associated with higher risks of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, with comparable 90-day mortality risk. Further large RCTs are warranted to evaluate the outcomes with EVT in acute ischemic stroke with large infarct.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4120957
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4120957: Endovascular Thrombectomy Versus Medical Management for Acute Ischemic Stroke with Large Infarct: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Hritvik Jain, Shrey Gole, Aman Goyal, Siddhant Passey et al.
Circulation
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Abstract 4120957: Endovascular Thrombectomy Versus Medical Management for Acute Ischemic Stroke with Large Infarct: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Hritvik Jain, Shrey Gole, Aman Goyal, Siddhant Passey, A. Franco, Jyoti Jain, Ramez M. Odat, Jagriti Jha, Janhvi Shah, Nandan Patel
article en

Abstract

Background: Endovascular therapy (EVT) has revolutionized the treatment of acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions. Despite the increasing evidence for EVT, its efficacy remains understudied in patients with acute ischemic stroke with large infarcts. Patients with large-volume ischemic strokes are excluded from major randomized controlled trials (RCTs) despite contributing up to 25% of all acute ischemic strokes. Aim: This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical management in patients with acute ischemic stroke with large infarct. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review on PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library from inception to 15th May 2024 for RCTs. The inverse-variance random-effects model was used to pool odds ratio (OR) and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. The statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: 6 RCTs with 1887 patients (945: EVT and 942: medical management) were included. The mean age in both EVT and medical management groups was 70 ± 11.4 years. EVT was associated with a better modified Rankin Score (mRS) at 90 days [OR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1.38, 2.04; p<0.00001], mRS at 90 days (0-2) [OR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.87, 3.27; p<0.00001], mRS at 90 days (0-3) [OR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.56, 2.46; p<0.00001], and early neurological improvement [RR: 2.35; 95% CI: 1.79, 3.10; p<0.00001] compared to medical management. EVT was also associated with a higher risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage [RR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.09, 2.66; p=0.02]. The 90-day mortality [RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.72, 1.02; p=0.08] was comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: Patients with acute ischemic stroke with large infarct had superior functional outcomes with EVT as compared to medical management alone. However, EVT was associated with higher risks of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, with comparable 90-day mortality risk. Further large RCTs are warranted to evaluate the outcomes with EVT in acute ischemic stroke with large infarct.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO), King Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur (IN), St. Luke's Hospital (US), Stanford Medicine (US), UConn Health (US), Stanford University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.