Abstract 4124875: Association between Elevated Lipoprotein(a) and Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in a Nationally Representative Sample of US Medicare, Medicaid, and Commercial Enrollees with ASCVD

Background: Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent and causal risk driver for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Few patients with ASCVD receive Lp(a) screening and real-world data assessing the association between elevated Lp(a) and risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality is limited. Objectives: To examine the association of elevated Lp(a) and risk of CV events and death in an ASCVD population using large US health claims databases. Methods: Patients with ASCVD were pooled from US Medicare, commercial, and Medicaid health plans from 2017 to 2022. Lp(a) levels were linked at the patient level from HealthVerity Lab Data and categorized as: <30 mg/dL (<75 nmol/L), ≥30-<50 mg/dL ( > 75-<125 nmol/L), ≥50-<70 mg/dL ( > 125-<175 nmol/L), ≥70-<90 mg/dL (≥175-<225 nmol/L) and ≥90 mg/dL (≥225 nmol/L). Patients were followed from the 1 st ASCVD diagnosis (index) to insurance plan disenrollment, death, or end of study. Cox regression, adjusted for age, sex, race, insurance, comorbidities, LDL-C, and other risk factors, measured the association between Lp(a) levels and risk of CV events and death. Results: Of 28.8 million ASCVD patients, 180,240 (0.6%) had Lp(a) levels: mean(±SD) age 68.6±1 years, 50.1% male, 5.9% Black, 2.8% Hispanic, 2.1% Asian, 72.8% Medicare, 21.8% commercial, and 5.4% Medicaid. Mean follow-up was 3.7 years; 23.3% and 15.7% had Lp(a) ≥50mg/dL [≥125 nmol/L] and ≥70 mg/dL (≥175 nmol/L), respectively. Black patients had highest median Lp(a) (50 mg/dL/111 nmol/L), followed by Asian (13.5 mg/dL/35.5 nmol/L), White (13 mg/dL/32 nmol/L), and Hispanic (11.5 mg/dL/29 nmol/L) patients. Lp(a) levels of ≥30-<50 mg/dL, ≥50-<70 mg/dL, ≥70-<90 mg/dL, and ≥90 mg/dL were associated with 7%, 10%, 16%, and 26% greater risks of CV events vs. <30 mg/dL (p-values <0.0001; cumulative incidence reported in Figure 1). All-cause mortality risk was also greater for those with Lp(a) ≥90 mg/dL vs. <30 mg/dL: hazard ratio (HR)=1.11, p=0.003. Similar trends persisted for patients with LDL-C ≤70 mg/dL. Conclusion: In this national-scale real-world cohort of patients with ASCVD, Lp(a) testing is infrequent and elevated Lp(a) levels were significantly associated with a greater risk of CV events and mortality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4124875
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4124875: Association between Elevated Lipoprotein(a) and Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in a Nationally Representative Sample of US Medicare, Medicaid, and Commercial Enrollees with ASCVD

Barnabie Agatep, Iman Mohammadi, Xingdi Hu, Allison Petrilla et al.
Circulation
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

Abstract 4124875: Association between Elevated Lipoprotein(a) and Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in a Nationally Representative Sample of US Medicare, Medicaid, and Commercial Enrollees with ASCVD

Barnabie Agatep, Iman Mohammadi, Xingdi Hu, Allison Petrilla, Lonny Reisman, Nathan D. Wong, Donna McMorrow, Tony Lozama
article en

Abstract

Background: Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent and causal risk driver for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Few patients with ASCVD receive Lp(a) screening and real-world data assessing the association between elevated Lp(a) and risk of cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality is limited. Objectives: To examine the association of elevated Lp(a) and risk of CV events and death in an ASCVD population using large US health claims databases. Methods: Patients with ASCVD were pooled from US Medicare, commercial, and Medicaid health plans from 2017 to 2022. Lp(a) levels were linked at the patient level from HealthVerity Lab Data and categorized as: <30 mg/dL (<75 nmol/L), ≥30-<50 mg/dL ( > 75-<125 nmol/L), ≥50-<70 mg/dL ( > 125-<175 nmol/L), ≥70-<90 mg/dL (≥175-<225 nmol/L) and ≥90 mg/dL (≥225 nmol/L). Patients were followed from the 1 st ASCVD diagnosis (index) to insurance plan disenrollment, death, or end of study. Cox regression, adjusted for age, sex, race, insurance, comorbidities, LDL-C, and other risk factors, measured the association between Lp(a) levels and risk of CV events and death. Results: Of 28.8 million ASCVD patients, 180,240 (0.6%) had Lp(a) levels: mean(±SD) age 68.6±1 years, 50.1% male, 5.9% Black, 2.8% Hispanic, 2.1% Asian, 72.8% Medicare, 21.8% commercial, and 5.4% Medicaid. Mean follow-up was 3.7 years; 23.3% and 15.7% had Lp(a) ≥50mg/dL [≥125 nmol/L] and ≥70 mg/dL (≥175 nmol/L), respectively. Black patients had highest median Lp(a) (50 mg/dL/111 nmol/L), followed by Asian (13.5 mg/dL/35.5 nmol/L), White (13 mg/dL/32 nmol/L), and Hispanic (11.5 mg/dL/29 nmol/L) patients. Lp(a) levels of ≥30-<50 mg/dL, ≥50-<70 mg/dL, ≥70-<90 mg/dL, and ≥90 mg/dL were associated with 7%, 10%, 16%, and 26% greater risks of CV events vs. <30 mg/dL (p-values <0.0001; cumulative incidence reported in Figure 1). All-cause mortality risk was also greater for those with Lp(a) ≥90 mg/dL vs. <30 mg/dL: hazard ratio (HR)=1.11, p=0.003. Similar trends persisted for patients with LDL-C ≤70 mg/dL. Conclusion: In this national-scale real-world cohort of patients with ASCVD, Lp(a) testing is infrequent and elevated Lp(a) levels were significantly associated with a greater risk of CV events and mortality.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of California, Irvine (US), Novartis (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.