Abstract 4124531: Digital Health Intervention to Enhance Optimization of Heart Failure Care: From Reciprocal Innovation using Human-Centered Design to Pilot Study

Introduction: Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for Heart Failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) reduces adverse events by 70%, but is underutilized. The Human Centered Design (HCD) methodology can be useful to build a strategy to optimize GDMT centered on patients’ demands and perspectives. We aimed to reciprocally innovate a telephone-based digital health intervention (DHI) from a Brazilian trial to an app co-developed for a US trial and iterate it again to the Brazilian context using HCD. We will evaluate the app’s usability and utility to facilitate HF GDMT optimization, considering barriers of the Brazilian public health system users, such as low literacy and socioeconomic status. Methods: Mixed methods study. Steps were carried out according to HCD method: (1) empathizing and identifying challenges, (2) suggesting solutions, (3) prototype development, (4) ranking features for feasibility and utility (5) engineering work and (6) prototype testing. In stages 1-3, semi-structured interviews were held with 10 HF patients and 2 health professionals. Steps 4 and 5 were done by the research team. In stage 6, we conducted a pilot study with 10 HFrEF patients, with at least one GDMT drug with an optimization gap. The primary outcome was the app’s usability assessed by an engagement score, and the app’s utility at 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes included change in self-care score using the European Self-Care Behavior Scale. After step 6, new interviews were carried out to capture the user experience and identify new iterations. Interviews were recorded and transcribed for content analysis. Results: The average engagement score was 80% (SD 16) and the app’s utility score was 82% (SD 8). The average self-care score increased by 32% (SD 25) at the end of the pilot. The main challenges were lack of knowledge about HF and self-care. Technical difficulties and lack of trust in the app to handle health data were mentioned. In the pilot, patients reported the app was easy to use and contributed to self-care and understanding of HF. Among the DHI components, teleconsultation was best evaluated, followed by the educational videos. The greatest challenge was connecting the blood pressure cuff and scale via Bluetooth. Conclusion: The app was well accepted and considered useful by patients. User contributions were fundamental to create tools that facilitate engagement and utility. The final product will be evaluated in a randomized, multicenter, clinical trial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4124531
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4124531: Digital Health Intervention to Enhance Optimization of Heart Failure Care: From Reciprocal Innovation using Human-Centered Design to Pilot Study

Edmar Geraldo Ribeiro, Zahra Azizi, Chris Todd Longenecker, Lílian Cristina Rezende et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4124531: Digital Health Intervention to Enhance Optimization of Heart Failure Care: From Reciprocal Innovation using Human-Centered Design to Pilot Study

Edmar Geraldo Ribeiro, Zahra Azizi, Chris Todd Longenecker, Lílian Cristina Rezende, Andrea Beaton, Roney Eduardo Lino, Beatriz Polachini, Erin M. Spaulding, Alexander T. Sandhu, Luisa C Brant, Ana Luiza Ciminelli, Antônio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro, Victoria Bramucci
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for Heart Failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) reduces adverse events by 70%, but is underutilized. The Human Centered Design (HCD) methodology can be useful to build a strategy to optimize GDMT centered on patients’ demands and perspectives. We aimed to reciprocally innovate a telephone-based digital health intervention (DHI) from a Brazilian trial to an app co-developed for a US trial and iterate it again to the Brazilian context using HCD. We will evaluate the app’s usability and utility to facilitate HF GDMT optimization, considering barriers of the Brazilian public health system users, such as low literacy and socioeconomic status. Methods: Mixed methods study. Steps were carried out according to HCD method: (1) empathizing and identifying challenges, (2) suggesting solutions, (3) prototype development, (4) ranking features for feasibility and utility (5) engineering work and (6) prototype testing. In stages 1-3, semi-structured interviews were held with 10 HF patients and 2 health professionals. Steps 4 and 5 were done by the research team. In stage 6, we conducted a pilot study with 10 HFrEF patients, with at least one GDMT drug with an optimization gap. The primary outcome was the app’s usability assessed by an engagement score, and the app’s utility at 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes included change in self-care score using the European Self-Care Behavior Scale. After step 6, new interviews were carried out to capture the user experience and identify new iterations. Interviews were recorded and transcribed for content analysis. Results: The average engagement score was 80% (SD 16) and the app’s utility score was 82% (SD 8). The average self-care score increased by 32% (SD 25) at the end of the pilot. The main challenges were lack of knowledge about HF and self-care. Technical difficulties and lack of trust in the app to handle health data were mentioned. In the pilot, patients reported the app was easy to use and contributed to self-care and understanding of HF. Among the DHI components, teleconsultation was best evaluated, followed by the educational videos. The greatest challenge was connecting the blood pressure cuff and scale via Bluetooth. Conclusion: The app was well accepted and considered useful by patients. User contributions were fundamental to create tools that facilitate engagement and utility. The final product will be evaluated in a randomized, multicenter, clinical trial.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Washington (US), Stanford University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.