Abstract 4126650: Prognostic Value of Femoral-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity for Cardiovascular Outcomes in Older Adults: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study

Background: Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) is a representative measure of central arterial stiffness and an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Femoral-ankle PWV (faPWV) represents peripheral arterial stiffness, but its association with CVD has not been specifically studied. Aim: To compare faPWV and cfPWV regarding their associations with CVD outcomes. Methods: We analyzed 3,402 ARIC participants without prior heart failure (HF), coronary heart disease (CHD), or stroke at visit 5 (2011-13) (mean age 74.8 [SD 4.9] years, 36.1% male, and 78.0% White). faPWV and cfPWV were measured by Omron VP-1000 Plus. The outcomes of interest were composite and individual outcomes of CVD (HF, CHD, and stroke). We ran unadjusted and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results: During a median follow-up of 9.0 years, there were 607 CVD events. Overall, faPWV showed an inverse association with CVD (Table). P-for-trend reached statistical significance in Models 1 and 2 and was borderline significant in Model 3 (p=0.077). In contrast, as anticipated, cfPWV was positively associated with CVD in all Models, although the association was somewhat attenuated in Model 3 (p-for-trend=0.045 and hazard ratio [HR] for top vs. bottom quartile 1.22 [95%CI 0.95-1.56]). Given their opposite patterns, we explored the ratio of cfPWV and faPWV (“cf/fa ratio”) and found that its association with CVD appeared stronger (p-for-trend=0.004 and HR for top vs. bottom quartile 1.37 [1.08-1.74]) than cfPWV. When each CVD subtype was examined separately, HF showed most consistent associations with our stiffness measures, and only the cf/fa ratio remained significant for HF up to Model 3 (p-for-trend=0.010 and HR for top vs. bottom quartile 1.40 [1.03-1.90]). Conclusions: faPWV was inversely associated with CVD, and cf/fa ratio appeared more strongly associated with CVD compared to cfPWV. Our findings indicate distinct prognostic implications of central vs. peripheral arterial stiffness and suggest cf/fa ratio as a new stiffness measure predicting CVD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4126650
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4126650: Prognostic Value of Femoral-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity for Cardiovascular Outcomes in Older Adults: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study

Tatsuhiro Shibata, Hirofumi Tanaka, Shoshana H. Ballew, Yejin Mok et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
article

Abstract 4126650: Prognostic Value of Femoral-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity for Cardiovascular Outcomes in Older Adults: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study

Tatsuhiro Shibata, Hirofumi Tanaka, Shoshana H. Ballew, Yejin Mok, Kunihiro Matsushita
article en

Abstract

Background: Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) is a representative measure of central arterial stiffness and an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Femoral-ankle PWV (faPWV) represents peripheral arterial stiffness, but its association with CVD has not been specifically studied. Aim: To compare faPWV and cfPWV regarding their associations with CVD outcomes. Methods: We analyzed 3,402 ARIC participants without prior heart failure (HF), coronary heart disease (CHD), or stroke at visit 5 (2011-13) (mean age 74.8 [SD 4.9] years, 36.1% male, and 78.0% White). faPWV and cfPWV were measured by Omron VP-1000 Plus. The outcomes of interest were composite and individual outcomes of CVD (HF, CHD, and stroke). We ran unadjusted and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results: During a median follow-up of 9.0 years, there were 607 CVD events. Overall, faPWV showed an inverse association with CVD (Table). P-for-trend reached statistical significance in Models 1 and 2 and was borderline significant in Model 3 (p=0.077). In contrast, as anticipated, cfPWV was positively associated with CVD in all Models, although the association was somewhat attenuated in Model 3 (p-for-trend=0.045 and hazard ratio [HR] for top vs. bottom quartile 1.22 [95%CI 0.95-1.56]). Given their opposite patterns, we explored the ratio of cfPWV and faPWV (“cf/fa ratio”) and found that its association with CVD appeared stronger (p-for-trend=0.004 and HR for top vs. bottom quartile 1.37 [1.08-1.74]) than cfPWV. When each CVD subtype was examined separately, HF showed most consistent associations with our stiffness measures, and only the cf/fa ratio remained significant for HF up to Model 3 (p-for-trend=0.010 and HR for top vs. bottom quartile 1.40 [1.03-1.90]). Conclusions: faPWV was inversely associated with CVD, and cf/fa ratio appeared more strongly associated with CVD compared to cfPWV. Our findings indicate distinct prognostic implications of central vs. peripheral arterial stiffness and suggest cf/fa ratio as a new stiffness measure predicting CVD.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Johns Hopkins University (US), New York University (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.