Abstract 4134267: Effects of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors on In-Hospital Mortality and 30-Day Readmission in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

Background: The effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) on reducing cardiovascular events in heart failure patients are well-established; however, less is known about their effects after a myocardial infarction. This study aims to investigate the effects of GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is on in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission in type 2 diabetic patients with/without heart failure who were hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort on type 2 diabetic patients who were admitted to the hospital for ACS from 01/01/2020 to 01/31/2024 across 16 West Florida hospitals. Patients receiving a GLP-1RA alone, SGLT2i alone, or both were compared to those taking neither. Chi-square and binary logistic regression were used to predict the clinical outcomes of in-hospital mortality, all-cause readmission within 30 days, and cardiac readmission within 30 days. Results: Among 7,481 type 2 diabetics with ACS, 392 (5.24%) were taking GLP-1RA monotherapy, 577 (7.71%) were taking SGLT2i monotherapy, 144 (1.92%) were taking both, and 6,362 (85.12%) were taking neither. The likelihood of in-hospital mortality was similar among patients on neither medication compared to patients on both (χ 2 = 0.06, p = 0.802), GLP-1RA monotherapy (χ 2 = 0.61, p = 0.435), and SGLT2i monotherapy (χ 2 = 0.002, p = 0.968). The odds of all-cause readmission within 30 days was similar among patients on neither medication compared to patients on both (χ 2 = 0.0004, p = 0.983), GLP-1RAs monotherapy (χ 2 = 0.07, p = 0.791), and SGLT2i monotherapy (χ 2 = 3.10, p = 0.078). The likelihood of cardiac readmission within 30 days was similar among patients on neither medication compared to patients on both medications (χ 2 = 1.63, p = 0.202), GLP-1RA monotherapy (χ 2 = 0.95, p = 0.329), and SGLT2i monotherapy (χ 2 = 0.94, p = 0.332). Conclusion: Our study found no significant differences in the odds of in-hospital mortality or 30-day readmission among type 2 diabetics with ACS who were taking GLP-1RAs, SGLT2is, or both, when compared to those taking neither. These findings further support the outcomes discovered in the EMPACT-MI trial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4134267
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4134267: Effects of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors on In-Hospital Mortality and 30-Day Readmission in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

Abraheim Al-Nasseri, Nishant Nerella, Huy Ho, H. Lester Reed et al.
1 links
Circulation
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Abstract 4134267: Effects of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors on In-Hospital Mortality and 30-Day Readmission in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

Abraheim Al-Nasseri, Nishant Nerella, Huy Ho, H. Lester Reed, Aakash Patel, Suman Pasupuleti, Usman Kazi
article en

Abstract

Background: The effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) on reducing cardiovascular events in heart failure patients are well-established; however, less is known about their effects after a myocardial infarction. This study aims to investigate the effects of GLP-1RAs and SGLT2is on in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission in type 2 diabetic patients with/without heart failure who were hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort on type 2 diabetic patients who were admitted to the hospital for ACS from 01/01/2020 to 01/31/2024 across 16 West Florida hospitals. Patients receiving a GLP-1RA alone, SGLT2i alone, or both were compared to those taking neither. Chi-square and binary logistic regression were used to predict the clinical outcomes of in-hospital mortality, all-cause readmission within 30 days, and cardiac readmission within 30 days. Results: Among 7,481 type 2 diabetics with ACS, 392 (5.24%) were taking GLP-1RA monotherapy, 577 (7.71%) were taking SGLT2i monotherapy, 144 (1.92%) were taking both, and 6,362 (85.12%) were taking neither. The likelihood of in-hospital mortality was similar among patients on neither medication compared to patients on both (χ 2 = 0.06, p = 0.802), GLP-1RA monotherapy (χ 2 = 0.61, p = 0.435), and SGLT2i monotherapy (χ 2 = 0.002, p = 0.968). The odds of all-cause readmission within 30 days was similar among patients on neither medication compared to patients on both (χ 2 = 0.0004, p = 0.983), GLP-1RAs monotherapy (χ 2 = 0.07, p = 0.791), and SGLT2i monotherapy (χ 2 = 3.10, p = 0.078). The likelihood of cardiac readmission within 30 days was similar among patients on neither medication compared to patients on both medications (χ 2 = 1.63, p = 0.202), GLP-1RA monotherapy (χ 2 = 0.95, p = 0.329), and SGLT2i monotherapy (χ 2 = 0.94, p = 0.332). Conclusion: Our study found no significant differences in the odds of in-hospital mortality or 30-day readmission among type 2 diabetics with ACS who were taking GLP-1RAs, SGLT2is, or both, when compared to those taking neither. These findings further support the outcomes discovered in the EMPACT-MI trial.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Memorial Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.