Abstract 4129945: Risk of stroke for AMI treated with temporary mechanical circulatory support: ten-year data from National Inpatient Sample

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the risk of stroke for temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) device treated acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Background: Data are limited regarding risk of stroke for temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) device treated acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: The national inpatient sample database was analyzed to identify adults who were hospitalized for AMI between 2012 and 2021, hospitalizations were grouped based on the temporary mechanical circulatory support device. Study design: In the final cohort, there are 8,272,163 (96.0%) weighted hospitalizations treated without tMCS, 265,870 (3.1%) with Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP) alone, 59,240 (0.7%) with Impella alone, and 16,225 (0.2%) with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) used during the hospitalization. Results: The overall stroke rates for patients who treated without tMCS, IABP alone, Impella alone, and ECMO group were 3.41%, 3.46%, 4.51%, and 13.34% respectively. Specifically, the rates of ischemic stroke for these groups were 2.95%, 3.12%, 3.96% and 10.11% respectively. The rates for hemorrhagic stroke were 0.68%, 0.55%, 0.81%, and 4.90% for the same groups. In the stepwise forward Cox regression analysis, the adjusted OR (aOR) of ECMO use for overall stroke was 3.04 (95%CI [2.66-3.48]), followed by Impella only use with an aOR of 1.79 (95%CI [1.61-2.00]), and atrial fibrillation (aOR 1.34, 95%CI [1.31-1.38]). The subgroup analysis revealed that hospitalization with age younger than 50 years old, those without hypertension, and those presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction are at particularly high risk of stroke for ECMO treated AMI. Conclusion: This ten years AMI hospitalizations analysis revealed that ECMO and Impella treatment associated with increased risk of both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Particularly for those younger than 50, those without hypertension, and those presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. However, treatment with IABP alone does not increase the risk of stroke.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4129945
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4129945: Risk of stroke for AMI treated with temporary mechanical circulatory support: ten-year data from National Inpatient Sample

Mingyou Zhang
Circulation
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Abstract 4129945: Risk of stroke for AMI treated with temporary mechanical circulatory support: ten-year data from National Inpatient Sample

Mingyou Zhang
article en

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the risk of stroke for temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) device treated acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Background: Data are limited regarding risk of stroke for temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) device treated acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: The national inpatient sample database was analyzed to identify adults who were hospitalized for AMI between 2012 and 2021, hospitalizations were grouped based on the temporary mechanical circulatory support device. Study design: In the final cohort, there are 8,272,163 (96.0%) weighted hospitalizations treated without tMCS, 265,870 (3.1%) with Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP) alone, 59,240 (0.7%) with Impella alone, and 16,225 (0.2%) with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) used during the hospitalization. Results: The overall stroke rates for patients who treated without tMCS, IABP alone, Impella alone, and ECMO group were 3.41%, 3.46%, 4.51%, and 13.34% respectively. Specifically, the rates of ischemic stroke for these groups were 2.95%, 3.12%, 3.96% and 10.11% respectively. The rates for hemorrhagic stroke were 0.68%, 0.55%, 0.81%, and 4.90% for the same groups. In the stepwise forward Cox regression analysis, the adjusted OR (aOR) of ECMO use for overall stroke was 3.04 (95%CI [2.66-3.48]), followed by Impella only use with an aOR of 1.79 (95%CI [1.61-2.00]), and atrial fibrillation (aOR 1.34, 95%CI [1.31-1.38]). The subgroup analysis revealed that hospitalization with age younger than 50 years old, those without hypertension, and those presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction are at particularly high risk of stroke for ECMO treated AMI. Conclusion: This ten years AMI hospitalizations analysis revealed that ECMO and Impella treatment associated with increased risk of both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Particularly for those younger than 50, those without hypertension, and those presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. However, treatment with IABP alone does not increase the risk of stroke.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Jilin University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.